Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Bryan <cyberbmcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 02:30:32 -0400
Thorsten Schier wrote:
You should not confuse obervable facts like evolution
it is not a fact it is a theory
or the movements
of planets with the theories with which scientists explain these facts (the synthetic theorie with natural selection as most important part for the evolution and gravity for the movements of planets).
Without natural selection, the theory of evolution would be dead.
No it would not. Things can evolve without natural selection, like genetic
drift.
Genetic drift would not explain the creation of new species.
Not alone, but it is often a part in the creation of new species.
[...]
Truth is simple.
Only to the simple-minded.
no truth is simple to everyone, only someone with something to hide thinks truth is complicated
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Jeff
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- References:
- Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: aureus
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Jeff
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Jeff
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Jeff
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Jeff
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
- Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- From: Thorsten Schier
- Rupture aortic aneurysm
- Prev by Date: dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and diabetes or Agent Orange
- Next by Date: Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- Previous by thread: Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- Next by thread: Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|