Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm

It seems to me I heard somewhere that John wrote in article
<bd5361h3bsb476395o3ocvmb9gcgida6ft@xxxxxxx>:

>On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:44:21 -0700, Don Kirkman <donkirk@xxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:

>>It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
>>article <4260E630.95EC6947@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

>>>Don Kirkman wrote:

>>>> I know; that's what I wrote about. I would hesitate to consider
>>>> referred pain a *trait*, however, since AFAWK all vertebrates have
>>>> enough similarity that referred pain probably occurs in all,

>>>Actually we do not know this.

>>Oddly, others in this thread seem to know it quite well, as they've
>>written it out for you. You've retained some of their information in
>>the parts you quoted in this very message.

>I can see that a rational person might quarrel with the use of the
>word "all" in the above. My burden of proof is pretty small, needing
>only a single counter-example whereas you must exhaustively rule out
>"all" possibilities.

I hope you're remembering that Andrew chopped up what I had written
including that "all;" the rest of what I wrote was: ". . . AFAWK
all vertebrates have enough similarity that referred pain probably
occurs in all, seeing that the nerves involved in the process branch
off the spinal cord in close proximity."

>Sometimes I think that you guys will posit most anything in rebuttal
>to Andrew, regardless of how silly a position you must take. I let
>most of them slide by (who has time to point out all the stupidity in
>the world) but this was too easy.

So how's about your single counter-example? Do you have enough
embryology or anatomy or neurology to name a vertebrate that has a
different nervous structure and if so are you able to demonstrate that
it has no referred pain? (And BTW I clearly said "probably occurs in
all")
.