Re: alternatices to statins
- From: "amatones" <amatones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Apr 2005 11:29:05 -0700
There is equally compelling evidence to support Dr Paulding as well.I
would not expect a "reputable" medical sight to carry and information
that led to a cure or prevention that was not based on prerscription
drugs. It would not be in their best interest. 35 years ago when
cholesterol was first being measured routinely the acceptable amount
was over 240.Now with the advent of statins they want it at 200. This
allows many more people to take the drugs. And now it is being pushed
to lower the acceptable levels to 180! More drugs. And statin have no
proof of curing or preventing heart disease. Over 65% of statin
patients have one more surgeries AFTER being on the drug.
Only you and your body can know what's best for you. If taking
prescription drugs makes you feel better and gives you some security,
then by all means take them. Nothing myself or anyone else say will
matter.I just know for myself the effects statins had on my body for
alomst 4 years is unacceptable to me.I'm not going to continue to put
my liver, hormone levels, muscles and nerve endings at risk any longer.
I have found a treatment that has been working gradually over the past
year and the results are the true test.
http://www.healthvision2020.com/heartdisease.html
http://www.healthvision2020.com/msg9.htm
http://vitamincfoundation.org/statinalert/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: alternatices to statins
- From: elgoog
- Re: alternatices to statins
- References:
- alternatices to statins
- From: amatones
- Re: alternatices to statins
- From: elgoog
- alternatices to statins
- Prev by Date: Re: Rupture aortic aneurysm
- Next by Date: Re: CHOLESTEROL, SIDE EFFECTS CITALOR/LIPITOR - CRESTOR - ZETIA - QUESTRANLIGHT
- Previous by thread: Re: alternatices to statins
- Next by thread: Re: alternatices to statins
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|