Re: Medical Tourism
- From: Jack Hamilton <jfh@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:46:11 -0700
"elgoog" <bjdefend-newsgroups@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>At this time, it is very unlikely that US insurers are offering the
>option of medical tourism. You would have to go out of your way to find
>insurance with international coverage.
Many insurance companies offer out of area coverage. Bombay qualifies.
The Mail Handlers Benefit Plan, available to many government employees,
says "Overseas Covered Medical Expenses - Reimbursable at the PPO
benefit level ? You pay 10%".
>In some cases, the surgeon you have in Bombay, might be the same
>surgeon you had in L.A. a year ago. What's more, in the U.S. the
>hospital staff to patient ratio is horrendous, and cleaning crews have
>been drastically cut. From what I hear Bombay hospitals are cleaner and
>better staffed. The medical tourism industry is growing and they are
>offering facilities and patient care to envy.
There was an article about medical tourism on the radio earlier this
year. It basically agreed with what you said - facilities set up
foreign patients are often superb (and not what most residents of the
county would get).
--
Jack Hamilton
Sacramento, California
--
<> Qui vit sans folie n'est pas si sage qu'il croit.
<> François VI, duc de La Rochefoucauld
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Medical Tourism
- From: elgoog
- Re: Medical Tourism
- References:
- Medical Tourism
- From: elgoog
- Re: Medical Tourism
- From: Hawki63
- Re: Medical Tourism
- From: elgoog
- Medical Tourism
- Prev by Date: Re: 'Atrial Fibrillation
- Next by Date: Re: Medical Tourism
- Previous by thread: Re: Medical Tourism
- Next by thread: Re: Medical Tourism
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|