Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- From: Jim Chinnis <jchinnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 02:26:56 GMT
Susan <nevermind@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in part:
>We know that pantethine is safer than statins, and as effective without
>risk.
It would take thousand of patients to demonstrate statistically
significant reductions in mortality. To my knowledge, those
studies have not been done usining pantethine. Neither have the
necessary studies been done to show whether pantethine reduces
second heart attacks, strokes, etc.
Large retrospective studies have linked statins to increased risk
of polyneuropathy and decreased risks of cancer. Have there been
any large retrospective sties of pantethine and polyneuropathy or
cancer?
Aren't the kinds of data that have been assembled for and against
statins mostly missing on pantethine?
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- From: Juhana Harju
- Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- References:
- Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- From: Jerome Ranch
- Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- From: Juhana Harju
- Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- From: GaryG
- Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- From: listener
- Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- From: Susan
- Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Humour, The Stella Awards
- Next by Date: Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- Previous by thread: Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- Next by thread: Re: One more safe alternative to statins
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|