Re: One cause of High Blood Pressure



Hawki63@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> "Just Ed" <just_ed53spam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1119946631.743713.213360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Hawki63@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> "Jason" <jason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:jason-2606051006410001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >
> >> > Some of the people that have high blood pressure continue to have high
> >> > blood pressure even if their cholesterol levels are normal. I realize
> >> > that
> >> > there are several reasons for this fact. However, the report below
> >> > mentions one of those reasons. The report indicates that PRIMARY
> >> > ALDOSTERONISM "may be responsible for as many as one in 10 cases of
> >> > high
> >> > blood pressure." There is additional information about Primary
> >> > Aldosteronism at the site mentioned below.
> >>
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> what you are doing is called "practicing medicine without a
> >> license"...you
> >> can be sued..civilly..for such "advice" that you dispense without the
> >> knowledge base needed..
> >>
> >> not to mention that even "real" licensed professionals rarely stick their
> >> necks out like you do on this board...in what appears to be an attention
> >> getting ploy...
> >>
> >> the first sentence above demonstrates your lack of basic knowledge..
> >>
> >> I think the group would benefit from your knocking it off
> >>
> >> my h.o. only of course
> >
> > Hawki,
> > Thank you for the legal advice which you have dispensed to Jason
> > and the rest of us. As you said, "real" licensed professionals
> > rarely stick their necks out like you have done on this board.
> >
>
> what I told him hardly qualifies as "legal" advice...simply a statement that
> his reading from books and extrapolating as he has done....is in truth
> considered practicing medicine without a license
>
> sorry you don't like the facts

Your post was legal advice to a greater extent that Jason's was medical

advice. He quoted another source rather than sourcing the advice as
you
did. If he was practicing medicine then you certainly were practicing
law.


>
>
> > I am curious, though, about the applicibility of your legal advice.
> > Since you did not qualify it to apply to any subset of US states or
> > even the entire US, it must be due some fundamental tenet of all
> > human laws. Please enlighten us further.
> >
> > BTW, where are you licensed to practice law?
> > Are you licensed in Jason's location?
> > Is there some other provision which covers and legalizes your
> > internet legal practice?
> > Unlicensed legal practice is generally illegal isn't it?
>
>
> again...please demonstrate that what I said is legal advice??

When you please "demonstrate" that Jason was giving medical advice I'll
substitute for you. ...and you didn't answer my queries.

> Practicing
> medicine without a license is about the most common phrase heard in the
> medical world....

I don't know how you'd support this claim but I don't see how it
matters.
Stupid comments repeated commonly are still stupid.


> do I tell him to call me for representation??

I'm not sure that that's required to show that anyone's practicing
law or medicine. No-one called Jason for advice, did they?

> you are way out of line...

No, you are out of line, and you appear all the more foolish for
doing exactly that for which you berate Jason. No, my error,
he offered public info for discussion. You directly sourced a
legal opinion.

>
> yes...I admit I sometimes do say a bit too much about medicine..and am
> trying harder to limit my posts to generalized knowledge...but at least I
> have the training education and licensure,,not simply reading something from
> a book and proclaiming innanities such as "most hypertension is caused by
> primary aldosterosim"...if Jason wanted to share what he had read...a simple
> "ask your doctor about XX" would have sufficed...

Bulloney. Fat chance that he could have learned anything from asking
his
doctor. I've never had one begin to explain the basis of his rec. much

less an area not known to be occurring (such as Jason's aldosteronism
ref).
There's no money in it. Medical pros are not the center of the
public's
learning about health science in our world and that not likely to
change
soon. I don't believe that you don't know this.

You certainly didn't add anything to his understanding. I couldn't
either so I didn't post.

I notice that you didn't claim that your "training education and
licensure"
were relevant to this discussion, legal or scientific. I don't mind if
your
life experience doesn't align perfectly with every discussion you
engage in
here. You and I can learn here also. We would all learn very little
by
exchanging "ask your doctor about whatever you read next".

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: One cause of High Blood Pressure
    ... >>> blood pressure even if their cholesterol levels are normal. ... considered practicing medicine without a license ... > I am curious, though, about the applicibility of your legal advice. ... medicine without a license is about the most common phrase heard in the ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: One cause of High Blood Pressure
    ... >> Thank you for the legal advice which you have dispensed to Jason ... >> I am curious, though, about the applicibility of your legal advice. ... where are you licensed to practice law? ... "most hypertension is caused by primary aldosterosim". ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)