Re: Balanced diet according to Chung WAS:Re: Who should we trust?

On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:30:29 -0700, Don Kirkman <donkirk@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>It seems to me I heard somewhere that John wrote in article
><t7khe11regephi4ad71kpftnmirrs41pbk@xxxxxxx>:
>
>>On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 20:31:29 -0400, Vicki Beausoleil
>><VBeausoleil@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>>"Bob (this one)" wrote:
>>>huge snip of a bunch of tripe
>
>>>> In the functional world, how is one to know if a diet is balanced? How
>>>> would you explain to one of your patients that they need to eat a
>>>> balanced diet and what it includes? Excludes?
>
>>>Uh, Bob, Chung doesn't have any patients, so explaining wouldn't be a
>>>problem.
>
>>>The original subject line says it all: "Who should we trust?"
>>>Definitely not Chung.
>
>>>I find it interesting that he also doesn't seem to know that the
>>>abbreviation for 'pound' is lb., not PD. He neglected to change that
>>>when the 2 (P)ound (D)iet suddenly became the 2 pound 'approach'.
>
>>>What a maroon.
>
>>Vicki, your color is showing.
>
>>Try to stay with me here. Consider that there are three most
>>important words to define this approach. The are: the number 2; the
>>word pound (starts with P); the word day (starts with D). Hence, two
>>pounds of food per day would be "2PD".
>
>>See, it really is simple.
>
>But apparently too complicated for you, John. If you even read today's
>messages (much less Google) you would see that for years "D" meant DIET
>in Chung's messages. Just because Chung decides that's not the right
>word doesn't change the facts of what he himself wrote into the record.
>
>AAMOF I can't recall him even mentioning "day," though if he has that's
>okay, too--it just doesn't make it the truth.

I keep trying to show you guys that I am not Dr. Chung. Do you
believe me yet? Anyway, I we responding to the previous poster's
apparent desire to change it to 2lbD or something, hard to tell, she's
possibly having a maroon day. I was merely giving you how I always
decoded 2PD, not the full history of how others may or my not have
encoded or decoded it.

John
p.s. better watch out - I'm a week out of heart surgery and starting
to get fiesty again. ;-)

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Heart contents WAS:Re: Classic 2 1/4 Pound Diet Got Peary to the Pole
    ... John wrote: ... >>measuring weight without regard for caloric density. ... CHung says it's ok to lie to dieters for their own good. ... > calories that pull the cart. ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • "John" uses big words. Film at 11 WAS:Re: Classic 2 1/4 Pound Diet Got Peary to the Pole
    ... >>when he makes particularly egregious statements that are patently ... "John" I was merely remarking on the coincidence. ... "I'm another sockpuppet of Chung's who comes out when Chung is beset ... by the folks who spot his foolish deceptions. ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Balanced diet according to Chung WAS:Re: Who should we trust?
    ... how is one to know if a diet is balanced? ... >>Definitely not Chung. ... >word pound; the word day. ... But apparently too complicated for you, John. ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Chunglish thinking...
    ... See, "John," I told you it was " well beyond your cogitative ... <LOL> ... Chung isn't argumentative, right? ... > claim to be an authority. ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Updated Chung FAQ, Issue 4.98
    ... If I have an obsession, it's to expose fakery, charlatanry, malice, dishonesty, fundamentalist OCD Scrupulosity and the self-righteous, self-congratulatory smugness that all such delusional perverts have. ... "John" is the only one of Chung's 625,500 ghosts who supports him. ... Or is Chung supporting him with his hand in his back...? ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)