Re: CABG Alzhelimer's Study
- From: "Sharon Hope" <shope@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:48:09 -0700
Clearly you aren't reading the trials.
No 'If' about it.
"Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" <sbharris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1125546573.991118.154510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Sharon Hope wrote:
>> That huge population taking statin drugs, too, is the reason why adverse
>> effects at a percentage of even 2% are having a horrendous impact on
>> many,
>> many people. When disability is preventable by education and awareness,
>> yet
>> continuing to happen, that is an unconscionable situation.
>
>
> If this was causing problems in anywhere close to 2% of people it would
> long since have been detected in trials looking for it. Therefore, it
> isn't.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CABG Alzhelimer's Study
- From: Bill
- Re: CABG Alzhelimer's Study
- From: Bill
- Re: CABG Alzhelimer's Study
- References:
- Re: CABG Alzhelimer's Study
- From: Sharon Hope
- Re: CABG Alzhelimer's Study
- From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
- Re: CABG Alzhelimer's Study
- Prev by Date: Re: Cognitive problems with simvastatin?
- Next by Date: Re: Statin drugs lower heart attack death-study
- Previous by thread: Re: CABG Alzhelimer's Study
- Next by thread: Re: CABG Alzhelimer's Study
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|