Re: Cognitive problems with simvastatin?


"Robert" <Robertitsme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:DLGdnedIesy0wobeRVn-2w@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> <mmlevy46@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1125856298.840933.267140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> listener wrote:
>> > "Sharon Hope" <shope@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> > news:_eCdnaQtrpJi_4feRVn-1w@xxxxxxxxxxx:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > "listener" <listener@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > > news:Xns96C697293EC2Esome1outthere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >> "Sharon Hope" <shope@xxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> > >> news:0-mdnX3d4pH-fYTeRVn-2A@xxxxxxxxxxx:
>> > >>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> If you *really* want to help others you would consider sharing
>> > >>>> some
>> > >>>> of this invaluable documneted information you are sitting on.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Which is exactly what we have done with the researchers producing
>> > >>> the studies, and the medical the authors of the books studying
>> > >>> statin adverse effects. We have shared generalities, backed by
>> > >>> doctors' concurrence with the Wall St. Journal's Smart Money
>> > >>> Magazine and the Los Angeles Times.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> People who are qualified to make use of the information to help
>> > >>> others.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >> I'll try this one more time:
>> > >>
>> > >> You must have, in your possession, copies of documentation that
>> > >> clearly state that statins, in particular, are the direct and
>> > >> definitve cause of your husbands disability. You have discussed his
>> > >> condition, his diagnoses and his team of doctors many, many times as
>> > >> proof of your proposition that statins are dangerous (or certainly
>> > >> more dangerous than any of us are aware of or admit). It is now
>> > >> time,
>> > >> after all these years and all the news reports, and the lengthy
>> > >> statin AE FAQ you put together for you to go beyond merely *stating*
>> > >> what you may have come to know as true but to *share* with *us* the
>> > >> actual documented facts of the case (i.e. scanned, redacted
>> > >> documents).
>> > >>
>> > >> It's really a simple request and I do not understand why you are
>> > >> balking. You're credibility is at stake.
>> > >
>> > > LOL. Call 40 or 50 attorneys and aks them if it is advisable to
>> > > publish personal medical records.
>> > >
>> > > Get back to us with their replies. YOUR credibility is at stake.
>> >
>> > I called some attorney relatives. No problem, as long as they are
>> > carefully redacted.
>> >
>> > >
>> > > BTW, it has been several months since you were to get back to us on
>> > > the research on statins and ED. Where is it?
>> >
>> > Ah, the ole switcheroo...nice try.
>> >
>> >
>> > So here's the bottom line: you've been making specific claims anout
>> > your
>> > husbands disability for years and you refuse to supply your own
>> > documented evidence to back up those claims. (Note: I am not saying or
>> > implying that he does *not* suffer from a disability..). With 50+
> doctors
>> > and a myriad of tests, surely there's *something" you can scan and
>> > supply? But you refuse, which is your right. So be it.
>> >
>> > Your credibility: 0.
>> >
>> >
>> > L.
>> All of you badgering Sharon continue to miss the real focus of her
>> postings--have you any suggestions that would help her and or her
>> husband?
>
> If you tell me what the diagnosis was when she saw all those doctors then
> yes. The problem is she doesn't want that kind of help. She is not here
> for
> help. She is here to warn people who discusee their personal medical
> information something she refuses to do.
> There was a poster who discussed the spinal stenosis she was diagnosed
> with.
> That is something very personal and medically specific. She was badgered
> by
> your friends.
>
> If not, what in the world is wrong with her efforts to warn
>> everyone who reads this board about the possible adverse effects of
>> statins?
>
> There is no warning but diagnosing by them based on specific medical
> information presented by the posters.
> If they present any symptoms what so ever and are on statins then they
> cogently slam their diagnosis on them EVEN when a definitive diagnosis not
> involving statins has been made. They still insist on the statins did it.
> Those are not warnings.
>
> A warning is if you are taking statins then you need to watch out for XY
> and
> Z.



Excuse me? I have published a set of PUBLISHED references on Statin Adverse
Effects to watch out for that is currently EIGHTY SIX PAGES in length,
available at:

http://www.freewebs.com/stopped_our_statins/StatinFAQ_031305wTOCv4.pdf

This is a set of PUBLISHED MEDICAL STUDIES on adverse effects.

This research was done to help others avoid PREVENTABLE disability from
statin adverse effects by watching for these adverse effects and recognizing
them as such. It was also done in the course of a search for treatment and
prognosis for full recovery.


That many physicians are unaware of these adverse effects, even those listed
on the Lipitor PI, is common knowledge, and obvious by the numerous queries
of people who describe exactly those effects upon starting a satin, yet
relating that their doctors tell them it could not be related.



>
> continuing to insist upon laboratory data from her husband's
>> medical records is just a method you have hit upon to further what
>> appears to me to be destructive actions against her. You diminish
>> youselves in this endeavor. I have not read many older topics due to
>> lack of time, but I sense from recent ones, that many of you are really
>> good people.
>> madelyn
>> >
>>
>
> So when they Sharon and Zee request or demand that a lab test like CK be
> performed or ask for the result itself then they are out of line because
> they asked for a lab result?
>
> I would suggest you have a double standard.
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Mevacor - New FDA warning
    ... > You are over stating the whole premise of statins and CoQ which is why I ... adverse effects from LIPITOR that caused him massive chronic ... muscle damage, mitochondrial damage, and peripheral neuropathy. ... the PREVENTABLE LIPITOR damage he has suffered and the pain he is in every ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Bad LDL cholesterol may benefit elderly
    ... > I supplied over THIRTY TWO references regarding adverse effects outweighing ... > any benefits of statins for elderly, ... >>> cardiovascular disease receive mortality benefit from statins in studies ... >>> at high risk for cardiovascular disease ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Study links fatty myelin breakdown to Alzheimers
    ... placebo-controlled trials with different statins and with statins at ... neuropathy and polyneuropathy (see links from FAQ on Statin Adverse Effects, ... The other pathway to memory loss is DEMYELINATION BY STATINS, ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Statins do NOT protect against Azlheimers
    ... > requiring withdrawal from the Alzheimer's Disease ... > significant cognitive adverse effects (per Dr. Goloob ... > particularly susceptible to statins (per Algotsson A, ... > "Patients with Alzheimer's disease may be particularly ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: Statins or lumbar spinal stenosis??
    ... My mother is in the process of being diagnosed with ALS. ... She was prescribed statins late fall of 2004. ... After 3 months off the drugs her symptoms ... >no recent diagnosis of spinal stenosis in your case). ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)