Re: CoQ10 conference
- From: "Robert" <Robertitsme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 23:01:13 -0700
"Sharon Hope" <shope@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5JSdnZ8mHewt6YPeRVn-gQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> LOL.
>
> Lipitor does ~ $10 BILLION per year.
>
> You think that the non-patentable supplement CoQ10 in the food category,
> which MIGHT hit $200 Million per year in 2006 is in the running? You see
> this as an industry throwing its weight around?
It sponsors research on it's behalf.
>
> Remind me not to take any tips on the stock market from you.
>
> ROFL!!!
It wasn't for the financial advantage but for the financial disclosure of
studies you refer here to.
>
> BTW, they haven't been able to identify a single adverse effect from
CoQ10.
> But they have seen it do incredible good in cases of Cerebellar Ataxia and
> Parkinson's Disease.
Studies paid by who? That's the whole point.
They call it incredible while others call it "negative or neutral".
You want to have them do research for you?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CoQ10 conference
- From: Sharon Hope
- Re: CoQ10 conference
- From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
- Re: CoQ10 conference
- References:
- CoQ10 conference
- From: Robert
- Re: CoQ10 conference
- From: Sharon Hope
- CoQ10 conference
- Prev by Date: Re: CoQ10 conference
- Next by Date: Re: Cognitive problems with simvastatin?
- Previous by thread: Re: CoQ10 conference
- Next by thread: Re: CoQ10 conference
- Index(es):