Re: CoQ10 conference


"Robert" <Robertitsme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vI2dnWlBcuvpH4PeRVn-uQ@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Sharon Hope" <shope@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:5JSdnZ8mHewt6YPeRVn-gQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> LOL.
>>
>> Lipitor does ~ $10 BILLION per year.
>>
>> You think that the non-patentable supplement CoQ10 in the food category,
>> which MIGHT hit $200 Million per year in 2006 is in the running? You see
>> this as an industry throwing its weight around?
>
> It sponsors research on it's behalf.
>
>>
>> Remind me not to take any tips on the stock market from you.
>>
>> ROFL!!!
>
> It wasn't for the financial advantage but for the financial disclosure of
> studies you refer here to.
>
>>
>> BTW, they haven't been able to identify a single adverse effect from
> CoQ10.
>> But they have seen it do incredible good in cases of Cerebellar Ataxia
>> and
>> Parkinson's Disease.
>
> Studies paid by who? That's the whole point.
> They call it incredible while others call it "negative or neutral".
> You want to have them do research for you?
>

You have yet to list a single link to a study paid for by a producer of
CoQ10.

Where is the evidence?


>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: CoQ10 conference
    ... >>> Remind me not to take any tips on the stock market from you. ... >> It wasn't for the financial advantage but for the financial disclosure ... they haven't been able to identify a single adverse effect from ... >> Studies paid by who? ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
  • Re: CoQ10 conference
    ... > You think that the non-patentable supplement CoQ10 in the food category, ... It sponsors research on it's behalf. ... It wasn't for the financial advantage but for the financial disclosure of ... Studies paid by who? ...
    (sci.med.cardiology)
Quantcast