Re: Chung? RIP or good luck in the sanatarium

we shall never really know

i think he's alive........ just restrained now

Mableton, job well done..............

sigh

kate

"GaryG" <sorrynoemail@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:gDG0f.1784$2_6.1714@xxxxxxxxxxx
> "Bob (this one)" <Bob@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
> news:11k610ia9qcn4c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Paul Schilter wrote:
> >
> > > Robert, Sounds like a good summation of the
situation. Well stated.
> >
> > You really think so? Fair and balanced as the
unfair and unbalanced Fox
> > news folks like to say?
>
> Bravo, Bob....well said (here, and especially
your points below).
>
> GG
>
> >
> > > Robert wrote:
> > >
> > >> "bigjon" <bigjon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
in message
> > >>
news:1hgwkagcthta4.1wvwvywdl4h55$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >>
> > >>> lurking decided to add:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Has he left this group? Never heard
anything from him after
> > >>>> the floods
> > >>
> > >> :-(
> > >>
> > >>> He isn't posting probably because of the
bigots and philistines
> > >>> that have harassed him in here for the
last few months.
> >
> > <LOL> And Chung is the innocent pursued by the
evildoers. What utter
> > twaddle. And it all goes back a lot longer
than a few months. Since he
> > and MU decided to spam many groups with his
2PD and MU acted like a pit
> > bull whenever anyone questioned the lunacy of
that diet. Nastiness that
> > they carried over into real life invoking
civil and professional
> > authorities and into employment areas of
critics, as well.
> >
> > >>> If he
> > >>> feels anything like I do, then he would
not bother with this sad
> > >>> little group any more.
> >
> > It certainly is quieter now. With a lot less
religious nonsense coloring
> > what should be medical discourse. With a lot
less crap science from a
> > man who is ostensibly a scientist but who has
documented that he isn't.
> > Anyone who believes there actually was a
global - world-wide - flood is
> > a fool. Period. There's too, too much very
obvious evidence that it
> > never happened. Chung believes it absolutely,
he says. He believes that
> > there was an actual "Eve" who was the
progenitor of all humans, he says.
> >
> > >>> For what it's worth, I actually got some
good info and help from
> > >>> Chung.
> >
> > We all did. But the ratio of good information
to crap was way skewed
> > towards crap.
> >
> > >>> < bigjon hits the "unsubscribe" button on
his way out > < leaving
> > >>> the lights on with nobody home >
> > >>>
> > >>> -- I'm trying to see things from your
perspective, but I can't
> > >>> seem to get my head up my *** as far as
you lot can.
> > >>
> > >> He gave good short and specific answers to
many here.
> >
> > And he gave fraudulent nonsense many more
times.
> >
> > >> Unfortunately, once he got out of his
specialty and got baited into
> > >> commenting on 2-PD and religion as a retort
to personal attacks, it
> > >> became more of a vicious cycle.
> >
> > This is so far from what actually happens with
Chung as to negate any
> > meritorious points made. Chung is a deliberate
instigator, a deliberate
> > provocateur, who deliberately "misunderstands"
what people post so his
> > replies can be the sort that schoolyard smart
alecs offer. A lot of
> > nyah-nyah mockery. When he has used his
sockpuppets to go after people,
> > it's a vicious malice that he and they show.
> >
> > >> He is free to comment on anything
> > >> he wants outside his specialty but that is
exactly his weakest
> > >> points and subject to others in which they
know nothing of
> > >> cardiology but know more about
evangelizing.
> >
> > Whatever that garbled mess means. His
cardiology knowledge seems to be
> > broad, but not without some very specific
areas that appear to be weak.
> > Nutrition as it applies to humans in general
and cardiology in the
> > specific is a weakness so great as to justify
discounting anything he
> > says about it. His posts talking about how
many calories different foods
> > contain are pure, demonstrable nonsense. His
absurd understanding about
> > Mt. Everest climbers and their actions -
again, in the face of their own
> > words that flat-out contradict him - as a
stage for a diet that is to
> > fit everyone, everywhere, all the time is
right at the edge of insanity.
> >
> > >> Doctors and medical
> > >> professionals in general are generally
driven away from sci.med.
> > >> groups by others promoting an agenda or in
which they want to play
> > >> doctor just like in TV.
> >
> > And they're driven away by a belligerent
fundamentalist wacko who
> > challenges everything they say until they
finally see that there's no
> > profit in taking the abuse from someone who's
obviously unbalanced.
> >
> > >> They can google and answer medical
> > >> questions like anybody else. Let me repeat
this: They can not do
> > >> this in real life. There is nobody making
appointments to see them
> > >> and asking for medical advice as that is
against the law. These
> > >> people are intentionally confrontational
and provide no expertise
> > >> other than personal opinion.
> >
> > This is crap. There are several posters here
who are knowledgeable in
> > certain areas and they show it. Others ask
questions and push around
> > ideas. Some cite medical and scientific
studies as part of the
> > questioning or in making salient points. Chung
rarely ever supported
> > anything he posted with citations. It was his
opinion and there was
> > never any alternative. His absolutism makes
him a poor judge of real
> > life. His medical views were tainted with
religious irrelevancies.
> >
> > Pastorio
>
>


.

Quantcast