Re: Lawsuit questions need for Lipitor

x-no-archive: yes

Jim Chinnis wrote: 
"fresh~horses" <fresh~horses@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in part:


Jim Chinnis wrote:

Susan <nevermind@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in part:


I guess it depends on how one defines benefit.  If it alters the
behavior of pharma, we all benefit.


A lot of pharm companies that used to make vaccines were sued so often that
they quit.
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA


Gosh. Why were they sued? 


$$$$
--
Jim Chinnis   Warrenton, Virginia, USA

In every case? I know of at least one in which they ignored a danger raised by one of the investigators, brought a questionable vaccine to market, crippled folks, then withdrew it after suits were filed, thereby saving others from a similar, crippling fate. The FDA review committee made it clear that they were uncomfortable approving LymeRix, but felt they had no choice because all the right paperwork had been filed.

I knew of at least two folks in the trial who claimed their adverse reaction reports were rejected by investigators.

It's not all about money every time. It's often/usually about injuries and harm. When they can't give you your health back, you demand money.

Susan
.