Question re: Meta-Analysis
- From: jason@xxxxxxxxxx (Jason)
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:28:09 -0700
I have a question about a term used in a recent post:
META-ANALYSIS OF DATA--
If a statin company wanted to prove that statins do not cause
cancer, would it be possible to do the following:
Step 1
Secretly do a Meta-Analysis of Data of 50 studies.
Step 2
Eliminate any of the studies that showed that
statins do cause cancer.
Step 3
Do a Meta-Analysis of Data of the 20 studies that
showed that statins do NOT cause cancer.
Step 4
Release to the news media the results of the
Meta-Anylysis of Data of the 20 studies that
that showed that statins do NOT cause cancer.
They could say in the press release:
The results of previous radomised trials show that
statins do not cause cancer.
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question re: Meta-Analysis
- From: David Rind
- Re: Question re: Meta-Analysis
- From: Bill
- Re: Question re: Meta-Analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: LDL too low...?
- Next by Date: Re: LDL too low...?
- Previous by thread: Statin Meta-Analysis Fails To Tell Full Story
- Next by thread: Re: Question re: Meta-Analysis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading