Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: "eml" <mmlevy46@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Oct 2005 20:30:04 -0700
Don Kirkman wrote:
> > BTW, "unmasked" does NOT mean "caused by." It means a pre-existing
> condition was brought to light by or during a subsequent treatment or
> procedure.
> --
> Don Kirkman
BTW, I know what "unmasked" means--does not exonerate the treatment
that triggered the disease. I would prefer to know that a drug i am
taking can "unmask" a disease state.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: Don Kirkman
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- References:
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: James216440
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: MEM, MD
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: Don Kirkman
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: eml
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: Don Kirkman
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- Prev by Date: Re: Question re: Meta-Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Homocysteine Inversely Tied to Cognitive Function After Age 60
- Previous by thread: Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- Next by thread: Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|