Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: "eml" <mmlevy46@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 16 Oct 2005 13:12:13 -0700
Don Kirkman wrote:
> One could even argue that it's preferable to have an existing but
> undetected disease process unmasked so treatment can be started. I
> guess that's because I tend to prefer the known to the unknown risk. One
> might consider that an advantage of statins, if in fact they do unmask
> some diseases. :-)
> --
> Don Kirkman
you seriously think unmasking a disease process such as parkinson's or
ALS that may remain quiescent thru out your life time is a GOOD thing
so you may start treatment for it earlier--there are no cures for these
neurodegenerative diseases--just symptomatic treatment. what a
statement! M
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: James216440
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: MEM, MD
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: Don Kirkman
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: eml
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: Don Kirkman
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: eml
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- From: Don Kirkman
- Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- Prev by Date: Re: Lawsuit questions need for Lipitor: The ASCOT trial's 2000 women
- Next by Date: Re: Lawsuit questions need for Lipitor: The ASCOT trial's 2000 women
- Previous by thread: Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- Next by thread: Re: Cholesterol Levels Are Falling, But Red Flags Are Rising
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|