Re: Why I'm Happy I Evolved


"Bob (this one)" <Bob@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

> <LOL> I guess reading skills weren't big in your school. She's an
> evolutionary biologist with what appears to be more education than your
> whole family, and op-ed pieces are freebies.

In the newspaper to be read by people like me and now you are insulting me,
the intended audience of her work.

>
> So much for your stunningly ignorant observations. It appears that the
> content is beyond you, so you went after the form.

Who placed this content that is beyond my comprehension in the daily
newspaper and for what purpose?

Stupidly, but gamely.
> Deleting it all is a masterful touch, too. It's almost like it didn't
> exist. Right? Intellectual hairball.

I never asked for it so it does not exist. Everyone has a choice to read
whatever one wants to. It is opinion that is being rendered. I prefer
evidence and not opinion. Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one.
>
> Pastorio

""Or if you discover that the male's testicles make up a large
part of his weight, I can tell you that the females in his species
consort with several males at a time."


Here is my opinion based on her observations of taking males and weighing
their testicles:
Males with larger testicles are more prone to have itchy testicle syndrome
and will scratch all day long rendering them more unattractive to females.
The females will thus find other males to scratch their own itch.
My journalistic lead-in would be something like, "The biological basis for
Desperate Housewife's" by Robert.





.

Quantcast