Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: "Bill" <xxx@xxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:26:18 GMT
"Sharon Hope" <shope@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:wtGdnXdCluw_FXvenZ2dnUVZ_tudnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"listener" <listener@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9761B5F06797Esome1outthere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"eml" <mmlevy46@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1139178378.331103.285510
@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
listener wrote:
eml wrote:For whose record? Your *broken* record? Another asinine statement.
are you employed by the pharmaceutical industry? or do you take a
statin? or both? just wondering from where your vituperative responses
originate...
NO and NO, to answer your questions.
My responses originate from my frustration with those who twist, distort,
overreach, mischaracterize...and in Sharon's case, do it consistently even
when presented with contrary information.
Also, I wouldn't say using the word "asinine" is particularly vituperative.
I guess you missed a recent reply from Sharon to Bill where she referred to
him as a "LIAR"..."Absolute, despicable, loathsome LIAR"
"perversions, "ad hominem attacks, twisted reasoning","inane.." "sick
perversions", "venomous poisonous post" and ending with the subtle "your
LIES are obvious as is your pattern of perversion..."
For the record, Bill had LIED about my husband's medical records, and then
used the lies and misrepresentation and anachronism to attack him with
claims he was to blame for his disability.
No justification for lying about a person's personal medical history and
then using the lies and misrepresentation of the facts to justify an attack
on that disabled person. Calling a liar a liar is a resonable response when
the liar is attacking a loved one.
Bill's was just as sick an attack as the one this week that culminated in a
shootout resulting in the attacker and others left dead.
You are lying again Sharon. I said you knew from the start that your husband's
pains were being caused by the Lipitor. Yet he stayed on it for four years.
The problem was not the drug. It was suffering the adverse effects for four
years and doing nothing about it. You are so guilt stricken by this that you
can not accept the reality and so therefore distort reality in any way you so
as not to face this. Here is what you wrote:
"Note that he was complaining of muscle pain within weeks of starting the
Lipitor - doctor told him that it was common and he would just need to put
up with it and learn to live with it because if he stopped taking Lipitor he
would die."
If you wish to defend your statement, state what I said you consider a lie and
show how that does or does not fit with the above.
You can not, and therefore will not. And I'm not suggesting he alone was to be
blame but that the problem was taking the drug for 4 years while having
serious side effects you knew were coming from the drug.
Bill
Just a bit vituperative, wouldn't you say? I don't recall you questioning
that..
L.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: Sharon Hope
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- References:
- Statins and side effects......
- From: trumpetfish
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: listener
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: listener
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: trumpetfish
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: Tony Wesley
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: trumpetfish
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: Tony Wesley
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: Robert
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: Sharon Hope
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: listener
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: eml
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: listener
- Re: Statins and side effects......
- From: Sharon Hope
- Statins and side effects......
- Prev by Date: Re: SuperBowlSunday: Professional athletes rarely tolerate statins
- Next by Date: Re: Statins and side effects......
- Previous by thread: Re: Statins and side effects......
- Next by thread: Re: Statins and side effects......
- Index(es):