Re: Statins and muscle damage
- From: "David Rollo" <drollo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 May 2006 06:02:27 -0700
David Rind wrote:
A blood test is unlikely to be of help since people can have
high muscle enzyme values without injury and normal values
despite injury
However, depending on how we are defining "injury", is it not
fair to say that if (1) there is no enzyme elevation, and (2)
there are no symptoms, then there is no injury? Or in other
words, no need to worry?
A couple of caveats, of course: A. Although there may be no
current injury, the future remains unpredictable, and muscle
symptoms (which are nearly always mild and reversible) may arise
at any time.
B. Some people** have chosen to identify high levels of
prostaglandin F as indicating statin-induced "oxidative injury",
which may therefore be a marker of a concealed form of muscle or
other damage. The evidence for this seems to me weak,
circumstantial and lacking clinical relevance, but it's an area
that needs more work.
David Rollo
** Sinzinger H et al (2002) Drug Safety 25:877-883
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Statins and muscle damage
- From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
- Re: Statins and muscle damage
- From: David Rind
- Re: Statins and muscle damage
- References:
- Statins and muscle damage
- From: Javier
- Re: Statins and muscle damage
- From: David Rind
- Statins and muscle damage
- Prev by Date: Re: Quarantines
- Next by Date: Re: Statins and muscle damage
- Previous by thread: Re: Statins and muscle damage
- Next by thread: Re: Statins and muscle damage
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|