Re: Cheese
- From: Jim Chinnis <jchinnis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:28:06 GMT
"Juhana Harju" <shantigiriorama@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in part:
Jim Chinnis wrote:
: William Wagner <not-to-here-williamwag@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in part:
:
:: Found this too Jim.
::
:: http://www.theses.ulaval.ca/2004/22151/ch01.html#d0e751
::
::
:: Perhaps more crapola. :))
:
: No, but it's a plan for research if my skimming is right. Not really
: what I mean. I'm talking about a single study that shows that
: consuming more saturated fat rather than (preferably) a number of
: other things causes the rate of disease and death to rise.
Nowadays there are ethical reasons why such trial can not be done. It would
be unethical to put any patient on a saturated fat diet as it is considered
to be atherogenic based on a large body of evidence.
Sometimes we discover that what we knew to be true was wrong. A number of
well-established medical/surgical procedures have been abandoned because
randomized trials showed them to be worthless or worse.
But I agree that the current mindset (and evidence) would make a sat-fat
randomized trial difficult. I just wonder about the hundreds of millions of
people who avoid sat fat to improve their health. Suppose they are making it
worse? Surely letting that possibly go on is unethical also?
--
Jim Chinnis Warrenton, Virginia, USA
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cheese
- From: Juhana Harju
- Re: Cheese
- References:
- Cheese
- From: Buddha Pest
- Re: Cheese
- From: Joe Doe
- Re: Cheese
- From: Jim Chinnis
- Re: Cheese
- From: William Wagner
- Re: Cheese
- From: Susan
- Re: Cheese
- From: William Wagner
- Re: Cheese
- From: Jim Chinnis
- Re: Cheese
- From: Juhana Harju
- Cheese
- Prev by Date: Re: Cheese
- Next by Date: Re: Cheese
- Previous by thread: Re: Cheese
- Next by thread: Re: Cheese
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading