Re: Cheese
- From: Susan <nevermind@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:46:38 -0400
x-no-archive: yes
Juhana Harju wrote:
I understand you reasoning. As there are _numerous_ metabolic ways saturated fats have been found to be harmful it is very likely that the overall effect is also detrimental.
You haven't yet cited a single one that's well controlled for variables. Your assertion is, therefore, unethical and a lie.
In addition, there is the epidemiological evidence and
many feeding studies.
See above. In the Framingham nurse's study, the highest fat eaters had the least CVD and breast cancer; the highest starch eaters had the most. Some researchers spun it the other way.
However, I am willing to admit that there is an possibility that for some subgroups increasing saturated fats _might_ be beneficial, e.g. some elderly people, as high serum cholesterol is protecting in very old age.
You have yet to cite a single credible study finding a causative role for saturated fat in any health risk.
Susan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cheese
- From: Juhana Harju
- Re: Cheese
- References:
- Re: Cheese
- From: Joe Doe
- Re: Cheese
- From: Jim Chinnis
- Re: Cheese
- From: William Wagner
- Re: Cheese
- From: Susan
- Re: Cheese
- From: William Wagner
- Re: Cheese
- From: Jim Chinnis
- Re: Cheese
- From: Juhana Harju
- Re: Cheese
- From: Jim Chinnis
- Re: Cheese
- From: Juhana Harju
- Re: Cheese
- From: Juhana Harju
- Re: Cheese
- From: Jim Chinnis
- Re: Cheese
- From: Juhana Harju
- Re: Cheese
- Prev by Date: Re: Cheese
- Next by Date: Re: Cheese
- Previous by thread: Re: Cheese
- Next by thread: Re: Cheese
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|