Re: Mystery Babylon

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article <1156872466.076872.255420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Don Kirkman wrote:
Andrew wrote:

Don Kirkman wrote:
Andrew wrote:

Don Kirkman wrote:

* This is not to say that the compilers or editors were aware the
documents were not historically or factually true.

What you have written is inherently contradictory.

Not at all.

Your snipping what you had written in your vain attempt to disrupt the
contradiction is proof that you now recognize the inherent
contradiction. Thankfully, folks can go back into the Google archives
if they wish to review what you had written.

I'll restore it for you:

False dichotomy; there is reason to believe that some Biblical materials
were in fact fictional and/or faked* and yet were found to have
spiritual lessons for the believers. Among those we can look at Esther,
Jonah, and Daniel, for starters.

* This is not to say that the compilers or editors were aware the
documents were not historically or factually true.

Bottomline: You remain untruthful.

Bottom line: you remain hypocritical; you consistently mutilate, in
whole or in part, messages with which you disagree.

Now show me where the part I had snipped changed in any way the meaning
of what I did not snip.
--
Don Kirkman
.