Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- From: Rod <kc0oeb@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 10:58:57 -0500
Andy is Evil wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1185664807.772334.251900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Sock Notice: heartdoc9 in use. Socks 11 thru 17, and "andrew" busy having spam launchers reloaded.
Where to complain recently posted in other sci.med.cardiology threads, example:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/e8013ad2973e2e47?
hl=en&
Rod wrote:Be sure that if you complained of headlice, Andrew would stretch medical science to show the cause was all your VAT, so he could cynically piggyback his "eating approach".Andrew, I am on three medications to control high blood pressureWould suggest you ask your doctor about Limbrel (I do not have any
and a rythym irregularity, Toprol Xl, Enalapril and Hcz. I have
arthritus in my hips and lower back. What kind of pain killer can
I take with these meds, if any, that will not interfere with them ?
Rod
ties with the company that makes this product). It effectively
reduces pain of osteoarthritis by reducing inflammation while not
increasing CV risk as traditional non-aspirin NSAIDS have a tendency
of doing.
This would be a temporary measure until you lose all the VAT, which is
likely the underlying cause of your osteoarthritis.
Be hungry... be healthy... be blessed:http://HeartMDPhD.com/PressReleaseSCAM ALERT
SPAM SITE
Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,Hollow words when uttered cynically by Andrew to spam his scam.
Andy is Evil
Okay, you wannna play ? I'll play your way then. Do you believe in
innocent until proven guilty ? Yes or no ? I've seen no evidence
of Andrews guilt in anything here, and his advice to me certainly
checked out with my Doctor! You on the other hand have furnished all
manner of posts defaming, slandering and railing against a man who
in return has exhibited a kindness and tolerance towards you that
you have not extended towards him.
You wanna play, play with this fact: you repeated behavior towards
Andrew in your posts demonstrates and meets the guidlines set down
in federal law having sway over internet stalking and harassment.
Now, you want to talk about wrong, lets talk about you and what
you're doing, and what you've done. I don't appreciate you using
a thread which I addressed to Andrew to defame and stalk him. If
I had wanted your advice then i would ask for it, but your own
actions towards Andrew indicate that your advice is as worthless
as your actions towards Andrew.
Now, if you can't prove any of your claims against the man then stop
stalking him, and I'm not talking about previous posts archived
in Google. I'm speaking of something that will stand up in court,
and if you can't do that then your attacks on him are unjustified
and hateful, and pretty darned worthless.
Now if Andrew is pushing a diet, then by way of the value in his
previous advice I would say there will be some benefit to it and
I'll hear him out.
Do you understand ? I don't in any way want my posts associated
with any of your personal attacks. I know this is difficult, but
do you believe you can manage to tend to your own affairs for once ??
Rod
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- From: Andy is Evil
- Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- From: J Harshaw
- Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- From: liaM
- Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- References:
- Andrew, I have a question....
- From: Rod
- Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- From: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
- Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- From: Andy is Evil
- Andrew, I have a question....
- Prev by Date: Data Extraction Errors in Meta-analyses That Use Standardized Mean Differences
- Next by Date: Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- Previous by thread: Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- Next by thread: Re: Andrew, I have a question....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|