Re: Andrew, I have a question....

GODS AINT REAL wrote:
"Rod" <kc0oeb@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:b7Jri.411$rG7.135@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GODS AINT REAL wrote:
"Rod" <kc0oeb@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:TNyri.383$rG7.349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
J Harshaw wrote:
On Jul 30, 7:07 pm, Rod <kc0...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Andy is Evil wrote:
Rod <kc0...@xxxxxxx> wrote innews:9P2ri.172$ox5.38@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Andy is Evil wrote:
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartd...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1185664807.772334.251900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Sock Notice: heartdoc9 in use. Socks 11 thru 17, and "andrew" busy
having spam launchers reloaded.
Where to complain recently posted in other sci.med.cardiology
threads, example:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/e8013ad2973e2e47
? hl=en&
Rod wrote:
Andrew, I am on three medications to control high blood pressure
and a rythym irregularity, Toprol Xl, Enalapril and Hcz. I have
arthritus in my hips and lower back. What kind of pain killer can
I take with these meds, if any, that will not interfere with them ?
Rod
Would suggest you ask your doctor about Limbrel (I do not have any
ties with the company that makes this product). It effectively
reduces pain of osteoarthritis by reducing inflammation while not
increasing CV risk as traditional non-aspirin NSAIDS have a tendency
of doing.
This would be a temporary measure until you lose all the VAT, which is
likely the underlying cause of your osteoarthritis.
Be hungry... be healthy... be blessed:
Be sure that if you complained of headlice, Andrew would stretch
medical science to show the cause was all your VAT, so he could
cynically piggyback his "eating approach".
http://HeartMDPhD.com/PressRelease
SCAM ALERT
SPAM SITE
Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,
Hollow words when uttered cynically by Andrew to spam his scam.
Andy is Evil
Okay, you wannna play ? I'll play your way then. Do you believe in
innocent until proven guilty ? Yes or no ? I've seen no evidence
of Andrews guilt in anything here, and his advice to me certainly
snip
Rod
Hello Rod,
If you would like me to deal with your post point by point at another
time, I'm happy to do so, just say the word. For now, I'd just like to
deal with the first point that you've raised.
I've supplied some links to illustrate my points, but would invite you to
also look yourself through Andrew's posting history to see if what I have
written is valid.
If you use Google, you can see:
1.Andrew repeatedly cross-posting off topic. Medical info to Christian
groups, Christian screed to alt.support and sci.med groups. When other
posters challenged Andrew, he insisted that God was on topic everywhere.
Andrew chose to ignore an argument from one poster that there are certain
settings where acting on this is inappropriate.
2.When people responding to Andrew's posts set their follow-ups to the
appropriate groups, Andrew will reset his responses to restart the cross
posting.
3.In a science group, when challenged for scientific research to support
his "eating approach", he says a peer review exists, but that it will
remain on his desk until the time is right. Andrew has never posted
sufficient information for any interested party to look up and read the
document, or the document itself.
4. Andrew himself called his "eating approach" a "diet approach".
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/56763f68919c1...
hl=en& Now Andrew insists it is not a diet.
5. Andrew using a variety of posting identities rendering it awkward for
those who would like to 'plonk' him. What is his purpose in this ? Here's a possibility: "the use of a killfile is a sin"
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.christnet.christianlife/msg/c651...
41a670a?hl=en&
6. Some of Andrew's postings lead me to question how he applies scientific
discipline and how he acts as a medical practitioner.
(a) There are threads where he has insisted on a diagnosis based on very
little information, and when that person has insisted Andrew is incorrect
has been replied to with scepticism.
(b) Andrew has posted supporting a religous scam
(http://TruthRUS.org/RedSea) that even "Answers In Genesis" have
denounced.
(c) Andrew will take virtually any post and find a way to include
references to his "eating approach". Thus for any piece of advice or
information that Andrew offers, one is left wondering whether medical
considerations have taken a back seat to the desire to publicise.
(d) The weighting given to a bible story in a sci.med group in support of
Andrew's "eating approach", example:
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/misc.health.diabetes/msg/39d93848645...
?hl=en&
Or you can just google 625550 in sci.med.cardiology.
(e) The infamous email letter from Frank Hildner MD.
http://
snip garbage
you are full of ***-andrew is a dangerous phsychopath-and so are you.dr death needs to be stopped.
you go ahead and try to arrest some one, mother f*****.
come and try me,*ss wipe.
i'll hand you your ass.
Sure you will, creampuff....


try me bitch.
just try me....
you are a sick ***-just like dr death.
blow me.



Looks like we have another mouthy keyboard tough guy
that likes to stay anon and thinks he can't be found,
he doesn't know the capabilities of carnivore.

You might instill more fear in people if you force
them to set and listen to you speak for 10 minutes,
but this way you can run away to your friends and tell
them all sorts of lies about your heroic stand while
coming away unscathed after handing them their "ass".

Ooooohhh, you're so tough and scary........
.

Quantcast