Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: bigvince <Vince.Miraglia@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 13:46:58 -0000
On Aug 8, 10:25 am, David Rind <dr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, it wasn't. A relative risk of 1.01 with a CI of 0.89-1.15 is not a
slight increase in mortality risk and you don't get to claim it as such,
any more than I can pretend that the RR of 0.99 in the Cochrane
meta-analysis was a slight decrease in mortality.
--
David Rind
You are correct . In this study atenolol v placebo moratality was
unchanged ; but there are anaysis that indicate atenolol increases
mortality rates when compared to other active treatments. Let me ask
again
At best this drug has little value and less evidence to support its
use in the control hypertension. Studies have linked it to an
increased risk of diabetes.It has unpleasant and sometimes serious
side effects. It provides very little [ if any ] benefit to the
patient . In every comparison trail it loses. Doctors her still
widely
prescibe it. Why?
Thanks Vince
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: David Rind
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- References:
- HYVET stopped early
- From: MarilynMann
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: MarilynMann
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: David Rind
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: bigvince
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: David Rind
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: bigvince
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: David Rind
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: bigvince
- Re: HYVET stopped early
- From: David Rind
- HYVET stopped early
- Prev by Date: sci.med.cardiology scheduled for sporge flood
- Next by Date: Re: HYVET stopped early
- Previous by thread: Re: HYVET stopped early
- Next by thread: Re: HYVET stopped early
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|