Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- From: MarilynMann <mannm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:17:41 -0700
On Sep 24, 2:42 pm, "Juhana Harju" <n...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't think so. Not referring to any studies does not mean that there are
no studies. ;-)
I did not say there were no studies on any of these issues. I said it
bothers me that he never cites any.
I did not find any studies
directly examining the effect of plant stanols to cardiovascular event
That is exactly my point.
, but
is it realistic to expect such study to be conducted?
Perhaps not, but neither is it reasonable to advertise products as
"heart healthy" etc. when there is no proof that the claim is true.
If you research plant sterols, for instance, you will find that there
are some legitimate questions about whether they are safe or not.
Not to
mention that, for people who already have high CAC scores, lowering
their LDL through diet and exercise is unlikely to undo the damage
that has already accumulated, although it may lower the rate of plaque
accumulation and have other benefits.
It depends of the program designed. The studies done by Dr. Ornish and Dr.
Esselstyn show that it is possible to reduce the amount of plaque by a
comprehensive life style program or by a strict diet. That might not be
suitable for everyone but for some people it might be.
Possibly. My point is that if you already have atherosclerosis, the
horse is kind of out of the barn. At that point, you may be worried
about stabilizing the plaque, as well as minimizing plaque
progression. There is reason to think statins can stabilize plaque to
some degree.
If you add pomegranate juice and vitamin K2 to that program it might be even
more efficient.
Administering fish oils is a good way to stablize the plaque and preventthem from having a heart attack.
I'm not against fish oil, or pomegranate juice or whatever.
If the problem is low HDL niacin might be a good choice.
I'm not an expert on niacin, but I'm not sure why you would prefer
using niacin over a statin. Niacin has a number of side-effects
(e.g., raises BG). If he has reasons for preferring niacin, he should
say what they are and cite the evidence for them.
Perhaps. The point is not just to lower LDL or raise HDL, though.
The point is to reduce your risk of having a cardiovascular event.
The overall point I was trying to make is that Dr. Davis never cites
any studies to back up anything he says. My point was not to promote
statins over other interventions. I have an open mind and I am
willing to look at the available evidence. It is just annoying that
he never cites any. I also do not think people who are at high risk
should be discouraged from trying a statin. Some people can't
tolerate statins, but many people can.
Marilyn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- From: Jim Chinnis
- Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- From: Juhana Harju
- Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- References:
- Blog on Statins FYI
- From: William Wagner
- Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- From: MarilynMann
- Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- From: William Wagner
- Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- From: MarilynMann
- Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- From: Juhana Harju
- Blog on Statins FYI
- Prev by Date: Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- Next by Date: Re: Poem of the Day
- Previous by thread: Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- Next by thread: Re: Blog on Statins FYI
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|