Re: >^..^< Nothing to sneeze at
- From: "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:30:51 GMT
big, black, soft, were retained, but their total number
was very small. There was little need for them, since almost any
adjectival meaning could be arrived at by adding -ful to a noun-verb.
None of the now-existing adverbs was retained, except for a very few
already ending in -wise: the -wise termination was invariable. The word
well, for example, was replaced by goodwise.
In addition, any word -- this again applied in principle to every word in
the language -- could be negatived by adding the affix un-, or could be
strengthened by the affix plus-, or, for still greater emphasis,
doubleplus-. Thus, for example, uncold meant ?warm?, while pluscold and
doublepluscold meant, respectively, ?very cold? and ?superlatively
cold?. It was also possible, as in present-day English, to modify the
meaning of almost any word by prepositional affixes such as ante-,
post-, up-, down-, etc. By such methods it was found possible to bring
about an enormous diminution of vocabulary. Given, for instance, the
word good, there was no need for such a word as bad, since the required
meaning was equally well -- indeed, better -- expressed by ungo
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Get Out Of The Procrastination Habit
- Next by Date: Re: Sekrit Santa uhnonsements
- Previous by thread: Re: >^..^< Nothing to sneeze at
- Next by thread: Re: Internet bezprzewodowy w powiecie lublinieckim
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
