Re: Jesus is LORD
- From: Don Kirkman <donsno2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:21:05 -0700
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article
<4959c45c-83f6-4cfe-ad2f-0433c5e15873@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
Jesus is LORD ! ! !
(saying this out loud to all of creation while typing :-)
Some caveats...
There are no caveats in the Holy Spirit.
Doesn't matter--
Indeed, without the LORD, everything you do is meaningless
(Ecclesiastes).
Which is: Don writes good sense...
Actually, his excuses for not being able to publicly say "Jesus is
LORD" make no sense.
No excuses necessary.
Yet, you proceed to give an excuse for your lack of ability.
I've told you several times that I'm doing what
God wants me to do, and that includes refusing to do what you want me
to do.
That obviously is not an excuse for inability but a denial of your
premise.
First, what I want is for you to do what GOD wants.
First, that is untenable as a Christian doctrine and, second, is
proof of an overblown case of egomania.
Thus, your written excuse makes no logical sense.
Since it wasn't an excuse but an explanation of a different point than
you want to believe, your response makes no sense logical or
otherwise.
This arises from your lack of understanding that your not being able
to publicly say "Jesus is LORD" is not by your choice to not have the
ability but by GOD's choice not to give you the ability.
Nothing can arise from a nullity. Thus your entire premise is beside
the point.
Second, you can't publicly say "Jesus is LORD" even if I wanted you to
do it because you are presently not what GOD desires.
Your word against mine. I prefer mine since I have fewer delusions
than you evidence here on the Internet.
Now imagine Stephen Hawking giving a similar excuse for not being able
to walk:
"I've told you several times that I'm doing what GOD wants me to do,
and that includes refusing to do that you want me to do."
Stephen Hawking giving the correct reason for not being able to walk
would be:
"I can't walk because GOD is not allowing it."
Since Hawking in an atheist he clearly would never say that. Right in
line with most of your "teaching" allegories and similes, it ignores
real facts.
Thus, your giving the correct reason for not being able to publicly
say "Jesus is LORD" would be:
Thus this whole line of argument is invalid, irrelevant, and
irrational.
"I can't publicly say that because GOD is not allowing that."
Bottom line concerning your predicament:
No predicament at all, simply exchanging information with a reader who
lives in an entirely different universe of discourse. I never expect
to change your mind, for many reasons, but my information may help
others to avoid sympathizing with your view or, God forbid, accepting
anything you say as valid.
--
Don Kirkman
donsno2@xxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Re: Jesus is LORD
- From: Don Kirkman
- Re: Jesus is LORD
- From: Don Kirkman
- Re: Jesus is LORD
- Prev by Date: Re: Jesus is LORD
- Next by Date: You are Invited to Visit my new Sizzling Site...
- Previous by thread: Re: Jesus is LORD
- Next by thread: Re: Jesus is LORD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
