Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed
From: Jan (jdrew63929_at_aol.com)
Date: 06/13/04
- Next message: jwndds: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Previous message: Melvin S. Schwartz: "Re: Composite fillings"
- In reply to: jwndds: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Next in thread: jwndds: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Reply: jwndds: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Reply: Ron: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Jun 2004 00:54:35 GMT
>Subject: Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed
>From: "jwndds" jnelsondds@shaw.ca
>Date: 6/12/2004 2:24 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <RoLyc.742576$Ig.501597@pd7tw2no>
>
>Three cheers for real science.
>
>jwn dds
Here is where that *real science* originated from. I came down to real $$$$ and
the good of the people came LAST on the list. What Mark has posted which is
typical for him, is that EVIL organized medicine and dentistry does MORE E V I
L.
Three cheers indeed.
http://www.wholisticresearch.com/info/artshow.php3?artid=20
(The Most Expensive Medical Mistake in The History of The World)
The History of Mercury Amalgam
In the early 1800s French dentists successfully (sic) mixed mercury with other
metals and plugged the mixture into cavities in teeth. These early mixtures
contained relatively small amounts of mercury and required heat to enable the
metals to bind together. In 1819 Benjamin Bell in England developed an amalgam
mix with much
more mercury in it that enabled the metals to bind at room temperature. Back in
France in 1826 Taveau produced a similar formulation and then in the 1830's the
amalgam concept was introduced in America.
****Many American dentists denounced
amalgam use on account of the toxic nature of mercury and when the American
Society of Dental Surgeons was formed in 1840 its' members were required to
sign a pledge never to use mercury amalgam on account of its great toxicity.
*****
The pledge
was abandoned within five years! (Curious historical note No1. Quick silver is
a common name for mercury, both here and in Germany, and the 'quick' in German
is pronounced quack, thus amalgam-using dentists became known as quacks - a
term
which has come to mean an inept and fraudulent medic - perhaps amalgam-using
dentists should still be called quacks).
****In 1848 the Society found 11 of its' members guilty of "..malpractice...for
using amalgam.." and suspended them.***
The arguments raged on, then, as now, until finally the god won - money that
is, and the A.S.D.S. dissolved in chaos in 1856. There was a lot of profit in
amalgam fillings, cheap to make and easy to use, compared with gold, expensive
and technically more difficult. The American Dental Association took its' place
and cunningly, did not take a stand on the amalgam issue, allowing market
forces to prevail until about 1895. The Encyclopaedia Britannica reports "that
amalgams were not altogether in good repute until after 1895", by which time
the A.D.A. was supporting the use of amalgam.
Rest at site.
Sad.
Jan
- Next message: jwndds: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Previous message: Melvin S. Schwartz: "Re: Composite fillings"
- In reply to: jwndds: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Next in thread: jwndds: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Reply: jwndds: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Reply: Ron: "Re: Florida Amalgam Lawsuit Dismissed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|