Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam
From: M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 16, 2004 (06-16-04_at_lombercartel.com)
Date: 06/16/04
- Next message: mdd: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Previous message: Peter Meiers: "Re: Another fluoride deception"
- In reply to: mdd_at_trip.net: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Next in thread: mdd: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Reply: mdd: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 22:01:42 GMT
<mdd@trip.net> wrote in message news:10d1f579l1jvn03@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-June 16, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t
> 06-16-04@lombercartel.com> wrote
> > Toxins do not travel along nerves. The only things that travels along
> nerves
> > is nerve impulses.
> >
> >
> >
> Please post the double blind studies that support your position. Unless
you
> are BSing like you so often do.
The double blind model is inappropriate for such a thing. However, YOU can
post proof that toxins do travel along nerves. That is something that a
person of your intellect should easily be able to do.
And, of course, as a pee-drinker, you should be able to discuss the drips
and drabs of toxins from an authorative point of view.
- Next message: mdd: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Previous message: Peter Meiers: "Re: Another fluoride deception"
- In reply to: mdd_at_trip.net: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Next in thread: mdd: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Reply: mdd: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|