Re: JOHNS HOPKINS -- Shame on YOU!!
From: Rick Russell (rickr_at_is.rice.edu)
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S.: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Previous message: Jan: "Re: Long-Term Effects of Chronic Low-Dose Mercury Exposure"
- In reply to: Ed Conrad: "JOHNS HOPKINS -- Shame on YOU!!"
- Next in thread: Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S.: "Re: JOHNS HOPKINS -- Shame on YOU!!"
- Reply: Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S.: "Re: JOHNS HOPKINS -- Shame on YOU!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:02:57 +0000 (UTC)
In article <u3mhd09gs5q4pja69on86dgd0t5ec7p7vo@4ax.com>,
Ed Conrad <edconrad@verizon.net> wrote:
> It meant that the inclusion in the jaw-like area was neither rock
> nor concretion but part of something that once lived.
Lots of rocks were part of something that once lived. Coal, for
example. Or chalk. How does that prove that it's a tooth (or a human
tooth)?
Rick R.
- Next message: Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S.: "Re: Dental Profession Logic Re: Amalgam"
- Previous message: Jan: "Re: Long-Term Effects of Chronic Low-Dose Mercury Exposure"
- In reply to: Ed Conrad: "JOHNS HOPKINS -- Shame on YOU!!"
- Next in thread: Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S.: "Re: JOHNS HOPKINS -- Shame on YOU!!"
- Reply: Joel M. Eichen, D.D.S.: "Re: JOHNS HOPKINS -- Shame on YOU!!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|