Re: why an implant and not a bridge?
From: Dr Steve (nospam_at_home.net)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Dr Steve: "Re: looking for dentists & orthos in boston/woburn/cambridge area"
- Previous message: Dr Steve: "Re: Implants Price?"
- In reply to: h00ligan: "why an implant and not a bridge?"
- Next in thread: Steven Fawks: "Re: why an implant and not a bridge?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 20:13:20 GMT
Because if you overstress those teeth, a cemented bridge will often break
off a tooth under the bridge retainer. You then have to pay for three teeth
again. If you have an implant and break something, only the one tooth needs
to be re-done.
-- ~+--~+--~+--~+--~+-- Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S. Troy, Michigan, USA .................................................... This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only. Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on the advice or opinion expressed here. Only a dentist who has examined you in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect your health. ...................... "h00ligan" <nomail@here.com> wrote in message news:2004070814425043658%nomail@herecom... > missing a first molar from about 5 years ago... just had an empty hole. > > why do most dentists recommend an implant instead of a bridge, > especially since the 2nd molar has a deep filling and would > cosmetically at least function better with a crown... > > to bridge wouldn't you file the bicuspid and second molar and lay a > bridge across all 3.. sorry i don't kow the technical terms > >
- Next message: Dr Steve: "Re: looking for dentists & orthos in boston/woburn/cambridge area"
- Previous message: Dr Steve: "Re: Implants Price?"
- In reply to: h00ligan: "why an implant and not a bridge?"
- Next in thread: Steven Fawks: "Re: why an implant and not a bridge?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|