Re: Put Up or Shut Up Was:"a windbag is afoot"
From: W_B (no_one_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 07/28/04
- Next message: W_B: "Re: Put Up or Shut Up Was:"a windbag is afoot""
- Previous message: Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS: "Re: Sugars"
- In reply to: Advocate147: "Re: Put Up or Shut Up Was:"a windbag is afoot""
- Next in thread: W_B: "Re: Put Up or Shut Up Was:"a windbag is afoot""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:23:07 GMT
On 28 Jul 2004 21:21:55 GMT, advocate147@aol.com (Advocate147) wrote:
>Stimulants project harm from one person on a stimulant to another friend or
>relaltive by a mind/body connection, literally and whether in each others
>presence or not.
That is a coherent postulate.
Now define what you mean by 'stimulant'.
--and--
'harm'
-- W_B wubbabubbazG@RBAGEyahoo.com Take out the G'RBAGE
- Next message: W_B: "Re: Put Up or Shut Up Was:"a windbag is afoot""
- Previous message: Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS: "Re: Sugars"
- In reply to: Advocate147: "Re: Put Up or Shut Up Was:"a windbag is afoot""
- Next in thread: W_B: "Re: Put Up or Shut Up Was:"a windbag is afoot""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|