Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place
From: Steven Bornfeld (dentaltwinnospam_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Steven Bornfeld: "Re: New Study-Mercury Exposure"
- Previous message: Steven Bornfeld: "Re: New Study-Mercury Exposure"
- In reply to: John Chewter: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Next in thread: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Reply: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Reply: Jan: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:51:01 -0400
John Chewter wrote:
>>Amalgam is a material that is over 150 years old, and there are many modern
>
> alternatives that can be considered.
>
> Water is more than 400 Billion Years old - what alternative should we
> consider?
Gatorade?
Steve
>
>
>
>
> "JWN DDS" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
> news:WPt6d.539522$M95.172144@pd7tw1no...
>
>>>Why We Use No Mercury
>>>in the Fillings We Place:
>>
>>Hygienists are placing fillings now? What is this world coming to?
>>
>
>
>
- Next message: Steven Bornfeld: "Re: New Study-Mercury Exposure"
- Previous message: Steven Bornfeld: "Re: New Study-Mercury Exposure"
- In reply to: John Chewter: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Next in thread: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Reply: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Reply: Jan: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
