Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place

From: Joel M. Eichen (joeleichen_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/29/04 

Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:52:49 -0400

On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:51:01 -0400, Steven Bornfeld
<dentaltwinnospam@earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>
>John Chewter wrote:
>>>Amalgam is a material that is over 150 years old, and there are many modern
>>
>> alternatives that can be considered.
>>
>> Water is more than 400 Billion Years old - what alternative should we
>> consider?
>
>Gatorade?

Gators are 400 Billion years old too ,, ,wait, that's dinosaurs
.......

>
>Steve
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "JWN DDS" <bob@bob.com> wrote in message
>> news:WPt6d.539522$M95.172144@pd7tw1no...
>>
>>>>Why We Use No Mercury
>>>>in the Fillings We Place:
>>>
>>>Hygienists are placing fillings now? What is this world coming to?
>>>
>>
>>
>>