Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place
From: Joel M. Eichen (joeleichen_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- In reply to: Happy Oyster: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Next in thread: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:56:13 -0400
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:57:06 +0100, Happy Oyster
<happy.oyster@ariplex.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:44:58 -0400, Joel M. Eichen
><joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On 29 Sep 2004 05:25:30 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>>
>>>Why We Use No Mercury
>>>in the Fillings We Place:
>>
>>We do not.
>>
>>Mercury is a relic from the past.
>>
>>Jan, what are you talking about?
>
>Well, Joel, THIS sounds great. When did you give up using dental
>amalgam ?
Because I am retired!
Joel
>
>Regards,
>
>Aribert
- Next message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- In reply to: Happy Oyster: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Next in thread: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]