Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place
From: Joel M. Eichen (joeleichen_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/29/04
- Next message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Failed Apicoectomy"
- In reply to: carabelli: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Next in thread: Jan: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:05:48 -0400
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:05:39 GMT, "carabelli" <redslaz3@att.net.not>
wrote:
>
>"John Chewter" <john@LESS_SPAMchewter.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:cjep8n$d4v$1@titan.btinternet.com...
>> Ok I was wrong about age of (this) universe
>>
>> "In a study published today in the journal Science, a team of researchers
>> says the universe is between 11.2 billion and 20 billion years old."
>.............
>
>Ask Joel, he was in high school then.
>
>carabelli
Do not laugh. I was in high school when they launched Sputnik!
>
- Next message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Failed Apicoectomy"
- In reply to: carabelli: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Next in thread: Jan: "Re: Why We Use No Mercury In The Fillings We Place"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
