Re: What I want (and dont want) from a dental newsgroup - what do you want from it?
From: Jan (jdrew63929_at_aol.com)
Date: 11/03/04
- Next message: Jan: "Re: What I want (and dont want) from a dental newsgroup - what do you want from it?"
- Previous message: Jan: "Re: What I want (and dont want) from a dental newsgroup - what do you want from it?"
- In reply to: StovePipe: "Re: What I want (and dont want) from a dental newsgroup - what do you want from it?"
- Next in thread: Jan: "Re: What I want (and dont want) from a dental newsgroup - what do you want from it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 03 Nov 2004 02:42:27 GMT
>John Chewter <john@LESS_SPAMchewter.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>> I want to read general current Dental Issues
http://www.toxicteeth.net/pressRoom_articles_Scanner_072004.cfm
Mercury Fillings Alarm Local Activist Group
Despite presence of a toxin, the American Dental Association says amalgam
fillings are safe
By Abe Proctor Of The Skanner
The fillings that are installed in the mouths of low-income kids during an
annual dental health day — and in the mouths of millions of other Americans
every year — are unsafe, two local activists said.
Amalgam fillings — commonly referred to as “silver” fillings — are
given to hundreds of Portland kids every year during Give a Kid a Smile Day, a
program put on by local affiliates of the American Dental Association and
corporate and nonprofit sponsors. They are also the most common fillings in
dentists’ offices around the country and have been in use for more than 100
years. The fillings are composed of approximately 50 percent mercury, a known
neurotoxin and considered among the most toxic non-radioactive elements on
Earth.
The American Dental Association, however, maintains that amalgam fillings are
safe. Its official statement on dental amalgam — posted on its Web site,
ada.org — claims that the other metals in the fillings bind with mercury in
such a way as to render the fillings “into a hard, stable, safe substance.”
Mercury is associated with a range of disorders, including autism, epilepsy,
fibromyalgia and multiple sclerosis, as well as certain cancers, heart and
kidney problems, muscular and respiratory ailments and changes in vision and
hearing. In pregnant women, exposure to elevated mercury levels can result in
fetal abnormalities.
“We are concerned about mercury in tuna, and there are now advisories that
pregnant women should limit their tuna consumption because they shouldn’t
expose their unborn child to mercury,” said Caroline Skinner of Mothers
Against Mercury Amalgam — MAMA — an organization of women concerned about
exposure to mercury through dental fillings.
“If mercury is being placed in the human mouth, shouldn’t we be concerned
about that, too?”
Amalgam fillings are composed of roughly half liquid mercury (43 percent to 54
percent) and half a mixture of other materials, including silver, tin and
copper (57 percent to 46 percent), according to the Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention. Many dentists favor its use because of its malleability and its
cost-effectiveness when compared to alternate materials such as gold or pure
silver.
Jack Ferracane, Ph.D., chair of restorative dentistry at Oregon Health &Science
University — one of the sites of the annual Give a Kid Smile Day believes
that amalgam fillings are safe.
“It’s been in use for a long time,” he said. “Mercury is a poison, but
it’s always a question of dosage. The amount of mercury released by amalgam
fillings doesn’t pose a health risk.”
Ferracane added that many studies have been conducted in an attempt to link
amalgam with mercury-induced ailments, but that none have conclusively proven a
health risk.
OHSU’s Prashant Gagneja, D.D.S. — who coordinated this year’s Give a Kid
a Smile Day event — also stands behind the safety and ease of amalgam
fillings. However, he said that fewer amalgam fillings were installed during
this year’s event than in previous years, with more patients — and their
parents — opting for composite fillings instead.
“In pediatric dentistry … amalgam is easier and faster to place on the
child,” Gagneja said, adding that composite materials have grown in
popularity because they are far less visible in the mouth than amalgam. “For
children, we are tending to use more composite, not because we’re concerned
about amalgam’s toxicity — because I think it’s pretty safe — but
because of aesthetics.”
Gagneja said he thinks that concerns about amalgam’s health risks are
“overblown.”
“Once the amalgam sets, there’s hardly any free mercury in it,” he said.
“The free mercury that everybody talks about as causing health problems is so
little in the filling itself … it doesn’t cause health problems. …
Mercury itself is toxic, I highly agree with that, but with the fillings
themselves, I don’t think the assumption (of mercury poisoning from amalgam
fillings) holds up.”
The American Dental Association admits that a minute amount of mercury (one to
three micrograms) is released into the mouth from a single filling every day as
a result of chewing and grinding but that this level of exposure does not
constitute a health risk.
“(Dental patients) should feel very secure that the many organizations
responsible for protecting the public’s health have said time and time again
that amalgam fillings are safe,” the site said. “Those organizations
include the World Health Organization, United States Public Health Service, the
National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration.”
The site provides a link to a World Health Organization report that reads,
“At present, there is scant evidence that the health of the vast majority of
people with amalgam is compromised.”
However, the same report goes on to say that a lack of definitive research on
amalgam leaves the question of its toxicity effectively unresolved:
“Nonetheless, the possibility that this material … could pose health risks
cannot be totally ruled out because of the paucity of definitive human
studies.”
Further, the report states that the lack of data on amalgam’s toxicity
necessitates the launch of a research program on the subject.
Despite the American Dental Association’s assurances, Skinner is among a
growing number of citizens concerned about the routine and widespread use of a
toxic substance in the human body. Among them is the National Association for
the Advancement of Colored People, which in 2001 voted to support The Mercury
in Dental Fillings Disclosure and Prohibition Act.
The bill, written by Reps. Diane Watson, D-Calif., and Dan Burton, R-Ind., was
introduced to Congress in 2003 as HR 1680 and calls for full disclosure of the
presence of mercury in fillings and protection for women and children against
the fillings’ installation. The bill has since been referred to the House
Subcommittee on Health.
In California, Assemblyman Dan Horton, D-Los Angeles, chair of the state
Legislature’s Black Caucus, wrote a bill ending the practice that mandated
that amalgam fillings be installed in the mouth of any low-income child
receiving a subsidized filling. The bill was signed into law in 2003 by Gov.
Gray Davis before he left office.
Sandy Duffy, also a member of MAMA, said that if dental patients are concerned
about mercury exposure, they should insist upon mercury-free fillings. Many
dentists, she said, make a point of advertising that they run mercury-free
offices.
Duffy cited a University of Washington study that found high incidences of
neurological problems among dentists with elevated mercury levels in their
urine.
“The federal government’s definition of ‘safe levels’ of mercury is
just too high,” she said. “If dentists and patients are developing problems
due to mercury, then it needs to be abandoned. Mercury is at least 40 times
more toxic than lead, and we would never start packing lead in kids’
mouths.”
According to the World Health Organization, the primary source of mercury
exposure to the general population is through amalgam fillings. A toxicology
profile for mercury prepared by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry in 1999 stated that “children may have greater exposure and greater
risks from mercury.”
The federal Environmental Protection Agency lists mercury as a serious
environmental toxin and, in addition to its recommendation that people limit
their consumption of tuna because of elevated mercury levels, has recommended
that coal-burning power plants take steps to reduce their mercury emissions.
Mercury is in the process of being phased out from use in thermometers,
vaccines, electrical switches and blood pressure machines due to its toxicity.
“When a mercury filling is removed, it’s classified by law as hazardous
waste,” Skinner said. “Why is it not hazardous when it’s put in?”
http://www.theskanner.com/cms/skanner/index.php/
- Next message: Jan: "Re: What I want (and dont want) from a dental newsgroup - what do you want from it?"
- Previous message: Jan: "Re: What I want (and dont want) from a dental newsgroup - what do you want from it?"
- In reply to: StovePipe: "Re: What I want (and dont want) from a dental newsgroup - what do you want from it?"
- Next in thread: Jan: "Re: What I want (and dont want) from a dental newsgroup - what do you want from it?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
