Re: Dr Steve's Continual lies and refusal
From: Joel M. Eichen (joeleichen_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/03/04
- Next message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: W"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Consultation with Dentist<RB, again>"
- In reply to:(deleted message) W_B: "Re: Dr Steve's Continual lies and refusal"
- Next in thread: Jan: "Re: Dr Steve's Continual lies and refusal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:45:09 -0500
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 21:31:09 GMT, W_B <no_one@nowhere.net> wrote:
>On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 01:22:26 GMT, "carabelli" <huerter@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
>>How many times do you think the male references were translated from 2000+
>>years ago? What is in the English versions now is an approximation of what
>>was actually written. Sorry, forgot who I was.........
>>
>>carabelli
>
>
>Yeah, you should ask Joel, he was there.
Rings a bell ......
Funny thing you know ,,,,,,,, if you pick up Chrisopher Marlowe and
some of Shakespeare's earlier works, much of that is almost
unintelligible, due to changes in the English language.
Now Bible stuff, the fascinating part is that the meanings are clearer
than various things that are written today.
The language itself is very direct, and very clear. Of course, it
retains all of the attributes of the clever folks who wrote it. It
gives us a window into how people were.
Its amazing to consider ......
Joel
- Next message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: W"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Consultation with Dentist<RB, again>"
- In reply to:(deleted message) W_B: "Re: Dr Steve's Continual lies and refusal"
- Next in thread: Jan: "Re: Dr Steve's Continual lies and refusal"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|