Re: Amazing email timing

From: The Webby (nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam_at_san.rr.com)
Date: 11/17/04 

Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 03:09:41 GMT

In article <0czmd.6567$GV5.4923@trnddc04>, "ares" <ares@verizon.net>
wrote:

> Yes, mine was from someone on another newsgroup I posted on who wouldn't do
> that, so what could be different about the email you got? It could likely
> be from some stranger.
> ares
>

Yes, I think it was from a stranger. But because the address wasn't
easily harvested ... oh well, it's not a big deal. But it is
significant for some unspoken subtle reasons.

Thank you for your posts which I know were intended to ease any anxiety
that is related to this "event".

TW
>
> "Adenosine" <adeno@nospam4u.org> wrote in message
> news:ju1ip0tkm5dniqv869n87qoo2p21l6kktn@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 19:44:05 GMT, The Webby
> > <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote:
> >
> > >In article
> > ><nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam-557480.10402915112004@orngca-news03.soca
> > >l.rr.com>,
> > > The Webby <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Whoever just tried to send me an infected email should know that it was
> > >> cleaned up before delivery.
> > >>
> > >> Any idea who would have sent that to me?
> > >>
> > >> TW
> > >
> > >I always get this "mail" from the same person. Hint: it's one of smd's
> > >own.
> > >
> > >TW
> >
> > You CANNOT trust the 'From' header of a mass-mailing worm generated
> > email. It is nearly 100% of the time incorrect.
> >
> > The only way to determine the 'real' sender is to use the lesser
> > forged headers.
> >
> > --
> > Adenosine
> > Semi-informed Dental Consumer ?