Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew
From: The Webby (nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam_at_san.rr.com)
Date: 11/17/04
- Next message: Rich._at_.: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Previous message: Rich._at_.: "Re: Abuse complaint to AOL re: jdrew63929"
- In reply to: Rich._at_.: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Next in thread: Rich._at_.: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Reply: Rich._at_.: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Reply: Dr Steve: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:10:28 GMT
In article <41b9ac92.103152015@news-server.hawaii.rr.com>, Rich.@.
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:51:54 GMT, The Webby
> <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >Hmm. I am always, always, always first in favor of encouraging open
> >discussion where all sides (maybe two sides but sometimes there are even
> >more) can get involved in the effort to share perspectives as a means to
> >gaining insight. One reason I have trouble accepting that J** D*** is
> >one real person has everything to do with that "person's" need to
> >kill-file me. Anyone who really knows *me* would not feel the need to
> >kill-file me. But in this case, there is overwhelming need to keep me
> >at arm's distance -- if not the 10-foot cyberpole --. This should raise
> >some eyebrows amongst those who have any idea about my historical role
> >in smd.
>
> Are you aware that Jan Drew regularly kill files people who
> persistently confront her about her lies and abusive behavior?? She
> has been kill filing (or claiming to) numerous people for years. You
> are one of many. There is absolutely nothing unusual about that.
> >
> >So the question is, "what tactic would work best?"
>
> I vote for mine:-)) Refer to previous post.
>
> Aloha,
>
> Rich
>
Yes, I am well aware of JD's comments about having people in her
kill-file. But you see, I did not go on record confronting her about
her lies or her behavior. Somehow it was predetermined to to have any
contact with me. Me??? Why me????
I do not use a kill file but have considered it now and then. I am much
more in favor of seeing what is going on around me than to pretend it
does not go on. However, JD's posts have not caused me to do any
research into the issues related to dental amalgam use.
Your tactic has many valid points. I think maybe... just maybe ... that
we should have an amalgamation of the POV within the newsgroup. If one
post, written with brevity to encourage reading, were created and used
by all who wish to implement this tactic, that may encourage the group
of individuals to respect that there are various issues at stake which
put together are reflected in one posted reply to all of Jan Drew's
posts until such time that she shows a willingness to communicate with
the group in a manner that is respectful of others.
TW
- Next message: Rich._at_.: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Previous message: Rich._at_.: "Re: Abuse complaint to AOL re: jdrew63929"
- In reply to: Rich._at_.: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Next in thread: Rich._at_.: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Reply: Rich._at_.: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Reply: Dr Steve: "Re: The Tactics Of Jan Drew"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|