Re: haven't seen dentist in 7 years
From: Dr Steve (nospam_at_home.net)
Date: 11/17/04
- Next message: Rich._at_.: "Re: To Jan"
- Previous message: carabelli: "Re: Richard H Jacobson Can't Answer"
- In reply to: Ron Wilson: "Re: haven't seen dentist in 7 years"
- Next in thread: Ron Wilson: "Re: haven't seen dentist in 7 years"
- Reply: Ron Wilson: "Re: haven't seen dentist in 7 years"
- Reply: Ron Wilson: "Re: haven't seen dentist in 7 years"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:12:34 GMT
Sure there are alternatives,,,,,,, do it sooner and complain and throw a
fuss when it fails and you are out $3K.
-- ~+--~+--~+--~+--~+-- Stephen Mancuso, D.D.S. Troy, Michigan, USA .................................................... This posting is intended for informational or conversational purposes only. Always seek the opinion of a licensed dental professional before acting on the advice or opinion expressed here. Only a dentist who has examined you in person can diagnose your problems and make decisions which will affect your health. ...................... "Ron Wilson" <rwilson290@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:cf127976.0411171040.4f2719a8@posting.google.com... > Joel M. Eichen <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:<npghp019t62nibcsse6c8f1r1k42p54oon@4ax.com>... > >> >> >Hi, >> >Well I've been going to this dentist since I was 13 (I'm 34 now), >> >although I haven't seen him for 9 years. >> >> That's okay .. .you are still considered a regular patient, but do not >> let it get past ten years ...... that's the cut-off. >> >> >> > My mom picked him at the >> >time and she worked for the Dental Institute at NIH, so I trust her >> >judgement. At this point, having not been to the dentist for 9 years, >> >and knowing that the gum around the tooth would bleed if I wasn't >> >absolutely adamant about flossing it, my inclination is to trust that >> >the tooth and root was legitimately decayed beyond repair. I suppose >> >I'll prolly seek out some other advice as a sanity check if I started >> >needing still more implants, >> >> This is dental newsgroup, right? >> >> >which might not be out of the realm of >> >possibility since we haven't done a comprehensive examination of every >> >single tooth in my mouth yet. BTW, he referred the implant itself out >> >to an oral surgeon who, based on my googling, is or was at one time, >> >on the board of the ADA. So I feel I can trust with some degree of >> >confidence that I'm good hands with all of this. >> >> That's cool. Many decisions to get implants are based upon oogling >> ...... >> >> > >> >I also told my girlfriend of 3 months over the weekend that I'd be >> >without a molar for the next 4 months and, though I'm not a mind >> >reader, it seems to be going over okay. >> >> Wait a minute .... dental implants ... I get it now. >> >> >> > If there were anything less >> >intrusive than those retainer looking devices as a temporary solution, >> >I'd definitely be interested. They seem good for day to day >> >conversation, but make me really uneasy when I think about getting >> >intimate with one of them in. >> >> Front toot' or back toot'? >> >> >> > I've seen on some web sites that you >> >can get a vanity tooth put on your post while you wait for it to bond. >> > I'm not sure a vanity tooth would work for a molar though since >> >molars such an active roll in the chewing process. > > > I guess I'm wondering if I really have to wait 11 months to actually > have a crown on this tooth that was just extracted? I thought I could > get an implant earlier and a crown in 4 months. Did I miss something, > or is my oral surgeon just being very cautious? He wants the socket > to heel for 5 months, then insert an implant and let that > osseointegrate for another 4-5 months, then put the abutement on, let > that heel for 4 weeks, then put the crown on. I can see this being a > very good way of ensuring everything is heeled over every step of the > way, but statistically speaking does a shorter turnaround time > dramatically impair one's chances at success? What about immediate > load implants on a molar? What about a cycle shorter than 11 months > to actually get a viable implanted "tooth" in the #19 socket. If it > has to be 11 months, it has to be 11 months, but I'm interested if > there are any alternatives. > > Thanks in advance.
- Next message: Rich._at_.: "Re: To Jan"
- Previous message: carabelli: "Re: Richard H Jacobson Can't Answer"
- In reply to: Ron Wilson: "Re: haven't seen dentist in 7 years"
- Next in thread: Ron Wilson: "Re: haven't seen dentist in 7 years"
- Reply: Ron Wilson: "Re: haven't seen dentist in 7 years"
- Reply: Ron Wilson: "Re: haven't seen dentist in 7 years"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading