Re: Steve Mancuso and Dan still lying
Jan_Drew_is_a_liar_at_liar.com
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: Clinton C Zimmerman: "Re: Mercury Levels Highest After Amalgam Removal"
- Previous message: Adenosine: "Re: NTI in Los Angeles? Any recommendations for Dentist?"
- In reply to: The Webby: "Re: Steve Mancuso and Dan still lying"
- Next in thread: The Webby: "Re: Steve Mancuso and Dan still lying"
- Reply: The Webby: "Re: Steve Mancuso and Dan still lying"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:53:34 GMT
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:33:03 GMT, The Webby
<nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote:
>In article <41b7f0c8.65264203@news-server.hawaii.rr.com>,
> Jan_Drew_is_a_liar@liar.com wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 21:59:46 GMT, The Webby
>> <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Suspicion does grow. I don't care so much about the real name of the
>> >person. I do care to know if I'm dealing with a real person or an
>> >invention.
>>
>> A couple questions:
>>
>> How do you think you are going to be able to make that determination
>> without finding out her real identity??
>
>If I invite someone to my home for a visit, I would first need to know
>who I am inviting. The person would need to supply that information.
Yes, but that information would include their real name. You said
above that you were not interested in her real name.
>>
>> What evidence would satisfy you that you are dealing with a real
>> person and realistically do you think it feasible that you will ever
>> get sufficient evidence??
>
>When the person shows up at my door and walks in, sits down,
>communicates in some language (even with a translator if necessary) with
>me, ... that's a pretty good indication that the person is "a real
>person". It would be good enough for me.
>
>>From this newsgroup, I have had people in my home from Italy, Canada,
>and from three states (maybe more) within the USA. They were all real
>people.
I don't want to put words in your mouth but I suspect that the answer
to the part about thinking if it is feasible that you will ever get
evidence to satisfy you that Jan Drew is a real person is *NO*.
I say this because I suspect that you have no intention of inviting
Jan DRew over and if you did I suspect that you realize that she would
likely not reciprocate. So the chances of your finding out whether Jan
Drew is a real person is about as likely as a snowball's chance in
hell.
Just thought I would save you the trouble of trying to find out and
getting frustrated in the process:-))
Aloha,
Rich
>
>TW
>>
>>
>> Aloha,
>>
>> Rich
- Next message: Clinton C Zimmerman: "Re: Mercury Levels Highest After Amalgam Removal"
- Previous message: Adenosine: "Re: NTI in Los Angeles? Any recommendations for Dentist?"
- In reply to: The Webby: "Re: Steve Mancuso and Dan still lying"
- Next in thread: The Webby: "Re: Steve Mancuso and Dan still lying"
- Reply: The Webby: "Re: Steve Mancuso and Dan still lying"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|