Re: The Once A Week ATTENTION Is Filled With Lies
Jan_Drew_is_a_liar_at_liar.com
Date: 12/06/04
- Next message: W_B: "Re: defectiveAmalgam mixers"
- Previous message: purple543210_at_yahoo.ca: "I do not like the new BETA Google Groups."
- In reply to: Jan: "The Once A Week ATTENTION Is Filled With Lies"
- Next in thread: Jan_Drew_is_a_liar_at_liar.com: "Attention: Jan Drew claims that she is a dentist with training in dentistry"
- Reply:(deleted message) Jan_Drew_is_a_liar_at_liar.com: "Attention: Jan Drew claims that she is a dentist with training in dentistry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:06:42 GMT
On 06 Dec 2004 20:38:05 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>>Subject: Once a week #2
>>From: "Dr Steve" nospam@home.net
>>Date: 12/6/2004 10:27 AM Pacific Standard Time
>>Message-id: <uw1td.29188$Rf1.24338@newssvr19.news.prodigy.com>
>>She is not a dentist, has no training in dentistry,
>>and does not really understand scientific methods.
>
>That's a lie.
Jan is a dentist. Hmmm. Now who is lying?:-)))
>Dr Steve is DISHONEST.
Jan is improving. At least she is not calling him a liar:-))
>
>I have a message, and it starts with *IF*
>
>*IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>
>NOT by a mainstream dentist, but an Alt. dentist who KNOWS the dangers of
>metalin the mouth and root canals, and follows correct protocol.
>
>I did, it saved my life
Jan did not have mercury poisoning from amalgams. And Jan knows it.
While I believe that Jan originally thought she had mercury poisoning,
now she realizes she did not. Here is the proof in her own words:
>On 27 Nov 2004 04:13:43 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>>Subject: Mercury Levels Highest After Amalgam Removal
>>>From: Mark Thorson nospam@sonic.net
>>>Date: 11/26/2004 6:50 PM Pacific Standard Time
>>>Message-id: <41A7EBE9.D78058B2@sonic.net>
>>>
>>>These studies show that mercury levels increase in the
>>>days following amalgam removal, and don't decline
>>>to the pre-operative level for about a month.
>>
>>Tell us something we didn't already know.
>
Well if Jan knows that mercury levels increase after removal of
amalgams and don't decline to pre-operative levels for a month how
does she explain the following.
>
>On June 17-18, 1999 Jan Drew had eight amalgams removed. Jan said that
>just before the removal of amalgams that she was bedridden.
>
>On June 26, 1999 Jan Drew stated that she went out line dancing and
>all her foot pain was gone. She said that the removal of eight
>amalgams made a difference because she was no longer getting a daily
>dose of mercury.
>
>Here are Jan's own words on June 26, 1999 when by Jan's own admission
>("tell us something we don't know) her mercury level was higher than
>it was before the removal.
>
>http://tinyurl.com/674oy
>
>>>>I am feeling much
>>>>better, because I am not receiving a new dose of mercury each day. The
>>>>elimination of 8 mercury amalgams has made a difference. Nothing psychosomatic
>>>>about it.
>
>>THANK GOD, my feet didn't hurt! I
>>felt alive again. What a blessing!
The removal of eight amalgams should have made a difference. But the
difference it would have made would be making Jan feel WORSE a week
later when the mercury would be flooding into her system. But instead
of making her feel worse she went from bedfast to line dancing.
>>How do I know it was the metal? Because my mercury level was monitored by my
>>MD, it was only AFTER the metal was removed that it started dropping and I
>>started to regain my health.
>Jan
>http://tinyurl.com/6n3ax
Let's see. Jan felt better than she had in two years BEFORE her
mercury level dropped. Jan went from bedridden to line dancing with no
more foot pain (soon to return since placebo responses are short
lived) a week after eight amalgams were removed when even according to
Jan Drew, her mercury level was higher than before she had the
amalgams out.
>
>What was that proof that Jan DRew was asking for?? Kaboom!!
>
>This post is for the benefit of any lurkers who may have some doubts
>about whether Jan Drew is a pathologic liar. I hope this post clears
>up any lingering doubts.
>
>I never expect Jan to admit that she lied even though her own words
>prove it beyond all doubt. Now Jan is admitting that she KNOWS that
>after her amalgams were removed that her mercury level rose and did
>not fall back to pre-removal levels for a *month*.
>
>So Jan is admitting that her mercury level was the highest in her life
>on June 26, 1999 when she went from bedridden to line dancing and said
>that the fact that she was no longer receiving a daily dose made a
>difference. Btw Jan still was receiving a daily dose of mercury on top
>of all the mercury released into her system during the extraction
>since she still had four more amalgams in her mouth!!
>
>Aloha,
>
>Rich
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
- Next message: W_B: "Re: defectiveAmalgam mixers"
- Previous message: purple543210_at_yahoo.ca: "I do not like the new BETA Google Groups."
- In reply to: Jan: "The Once A Week ATTENTION Is Filled With Lies"
- Next in thread: Jan_Drew_is_a_liar_at_liar.com: "Attention: Jan Drew claims that she is a dentist with training in dentistry"
- Reply:(deleted message) Jan_Drew_is_a_liar_at_liar.com: "Attention: Jan Drew claims that she is a dentist with training in dentistry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
