Re: Speed reading Was: Re: CVS Pharmacy, Bad Rep
From: Joel M. Eichen (joeleichen_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 12/10/04
- Next message: The Webby: "Re: Speed reading Was: Re: CVS Pharmacy, Bad Rep"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Twice a week--too much?"
- In reply to: The Webby: "Speed reading Was: Re: CVS Pharmacy, Bad Rep"
- Next in thread: The Webby: "Re: Speed reading Was: Re: CVS Pharmacy, Bad Rep"
- Reply: The Webby: "Re: Speed reading Was: Re: CVS Pharmacy, Bad Rep"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 19:10:21 -0500
Good one!
Very familiar though . I think I replied .....
Joel
Speed reading hurts memory!
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 23:43:20 GMT, The Webby
<nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote:
>If you're into speed reading ... read this!!! Someone I know IRL sent
>it to me. I thought I'd share it too.
>
>"I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg
>The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at
>Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer inwaht oredr the ltteers in a
>wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be
>in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed
>it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey
>lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I
>awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt."
>
>TW
>
>In article <kanhr01aopvu29bv6sh4iv308b3vscm8g9@4ax.com>,
> Joel M. Eichen <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:48:56 GMT, The Webby
>> <nospamattmjiatroepidemicnospam@san.rr.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <a1dhr01flo0c3rbok1mcpvbjtcldineahl@4ax.com>,
>> > Joel M. Eichen <joeleichen@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>>
>> >
>> >Excellent point! To read everything is a lot of reading. To have
>> >reason to read everything is ... well... some crazy kind of reason. For
>> >about three years, I read everything. I won't remember it all, of
>> >course, but much of it will sound familiar. Back then, all of it needed
>> >to be very familiar.
>>
>> Its great that you READ and have recall. I try to speed read
>> interesting posts, so I can at least go back and find it if it comes
>> up later on (and proves to be more interesting the second time around
>> ....)
>>
>> Sounds like a sappy song, I know.
>>
>> Joel
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >Why did I read everything (that came through my server)? It was key to
>> >"getting to know you, getting to know all about you... getting to like
>> >you ... hoping that you'll like me..." .. that sort of reason.
>> >
>> >But now, I am the first to say that I retired that job I put upon
>> >myself. I now need to decide after a certain amount of reading whether
>> >I have time to "get to know" every poster all that well.
>> >
>> >Could go on and on about this, but why? Netcanting... could not Netcant
>> >without having read the entire "book of smd" from one point in time to
>> >another.
>> >
>> >Webby (hope you read to here without skipping the rest!)
- Next message: The Webby: "Re: Speed reading Was: Re: CVS Pharmacy, Bad Rep"
- Previous message: Joel M. Eichen: "Re: Twice a week--too much?"
- In reply to: The Webby: "Speed reading Was: Re: CVS Pharmacy, Bad Rep"
- Next in thread: The Webby: "Re: Speed reading Was: Re: CVS Pharmacy, Bad Rep"
- Reply: The Webby: "Re: Speed reading Was: Re: CVS Pharmacy, Bad Rep"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|