Re: Dentists being bad
From: Jan (jdrew63929_at_aol.com)
Date: 12/18/04
- Next message: Sdores: "Re: Dentists being bad"
- Previous message: letsconnect: "Re: Spa Dentistry?"
- In reply to: Sdores: "Re: Dentists being bad"
- Next in thread: Sdores: "Re: Dentists being bad"
- Reply: Sdores: "Re: Dentists being bad"
- Reply: Joel M. Eichen: "Are Dates High in Fluoride?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Dec 2004 02:43:13 GMT
>Subject: Re: Dentists being bad
>From: "Sdores" sdores@bellsouth.net
>Date: 12/17/2004 6:14 PM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <xjMwd.9239$Z27.7539@bignews5.bellsouth.net>
>
>This is your gig, find it for yourself.
Wrong, YOU made the claim, YOU prove it.
>I have other things to deal with
>and mercury isn't my problem. You seem to like to research,so look it up.
>It was on MSNBC or CNN I believe which means you should be able to find the
>info at www.fda.org I would think since we are talking foods
I am well aware of the fish warnings.
My point was:
Mercury from amalgams is the number one source of mercury in people.
You also stated:
And shell fish have more of a danger to people, esp. children and pregnant
woman than does fillings.
That is incorrect.
Jan
- Next message: Sdores: "Re: Dentists being bad"
- Previous message: letsconnect: "Re: Spa Dentistry?"
- In reply to: Sdores: "Re: Dentists being bad"
- Next in thread: Sdores: "Re: Dentists being bad"
- Reply: Sdores: "Re: Dentists being bad"
- Reply: Joel M. Eichen: "Are Dates High in Fluoride?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|