Re: Regarding Amalgam...
From: Roy Brown (roybrown_at_sympatico.caNADA)
Date: 12/24/04
- Next message: Roy Brown: "Re: Fixed bridgework and gray lines at the gumline"
- Previous message: Electrical: "Re: Asking about Medical Application"
- In reply to: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Regarding Amalgam..."
- Next in thread: Jan: "Re: Regarding Amalgam..."
- Reply: Jan: "Re: Regarding Amalgam..."
- Reply: ChuckMSRD: "Re: Regarding Amalgam..."
- Reply: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Regarding Amalgam..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:53:29 -0500
You can say the same thing about almost anything.
-- Roy rem NADA to reply <clintonz@prodigy.net> wrote in message news:1103817171.904973.252770@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... | | | After reading hundreds of points the following point needs | to be made. Typically an amalgam argument will go like this: | Hg is safe for most people! | Hg is not safe for some people! | Some people really get affected! | Most are affected but it isn't easy to measure! | No one I know seems to be affected at all! | | My point is this: Hg exposure is a variable which is | not constant from person to person. Those with the lowest half of | exposure are in a different category than those with top 1% | or .1% Therefore it would make a lot of sense to preface all | statements with a phrase such as "Those with average levels of | exposure" or "Those with the very highest levels of exposure" | | That way everybody is talking about the same thing and the risks | can more clearly be defined. JMO |
- Next message: Roy Brown: "Re: Fixed bridgework and gray lines at the gumline"
- Previous message: Electrical: "Re: Asking about Medical Application"
- In reply to: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Regarding Amalgam..."
- Next in thread: Jan: "Re: Regarding Amalgam..."
- Reply: Jan: "Re: Regarding Amalgam..."
- Reply: ChuckMSRD: "Re: Regarding Amalgam..."
- Reply: clintonz_at_prodigy.net: "Re: Regarding Amalgam..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|