Re: What the one and only gentleman destist HERE said about Jan &
jdrew63929_at_aol.com
Date: 01/23/05
- Next message: Roy Brown: "Re: Implants or partials, or both?"
- Previous message: Vaughn: "Re: Snowman"
- In reply to: Matt: "Re: What the one and only gentleman destist HERE said about Jan &"
- Next in thread: Matt: "Re: What the one and only gentleman destist HERE said about Jan &"
- Reply: Matt: "Re: What the one and only gentleman destist HERE said about Jan &"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Jan 2005 17:35:06 -0800
Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry
From: Matt <m...@themattfella.zzzz.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:40:28 GMT
Local: Sat, Jan 22 2005 11:40 am
Subject: Re: What the one and only gentleman destist HERE said about
Jan &
Jan writes:
Matt just snipped the last word of this post.
Jan wrote:
>>From: Matt
>>The discourse might be improved if you and others would follow
>>conventions for quoting text in your replies. Nobody can tell from
the
>>above who wrote what.
> Nobody had any trouble but you.
Thank you for the proper use of quoting conventions in the reply to
which I am here replying.
Jan writes again on Jan 22, year 2005, time: 8:38 PM
Matt,
It appears you have tried to change the subject. It is clear what the
one and only gentleman dentist HERE said about Jan & others.
*****************: Re: More anecdotal evidence*************
LOOK IT UP!
>From: Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS m...@peoplepc.com
>Date: 8/7/01 10:48 AM US Eastern Standard Time
>Message-id: <3B700DCE.A0141...@peoplepc.com>
> Hi! (are you being intentionally semi-anonymous?)
> I agree 100%. I think that since we see only the words, it is too
easy
>to
>reduce the words in opposition to one's position to a depersonalized
"other",
>if
>you will.
> I know people who are ill. Some are angry, some are not. Very
few are
>responsible in any material way for their illness, and are just trying
to
>understand. Some wish revenge; some only try to find meaning in their
>illness by
>trying to prevent others from going through what they have. You're the
last
>person
>I have to tell that to.
> Dentists make a convenient target, and in some measure we deserve
it--as
>a
>group. Few of us deserve it as a personal attack, though sometimes
things
>seem to
>degenerate to a personal level here. I guess that's because we only
see the
>words,
>and don't know the people. I'd bet that if Joel were Jan's nephew,
they
>wouldn't
>talk to each other the way the do here (maybe worse, considering the
families
>I
>know). It's just important to understand that people who are hurt
deserve
>some
>understanding, whether or not we agree with their ideas.
>Steve
From: Steven Bornfeld (marst...@netzero.net)
Subject: Re: You should all be ashamed of yourselves (cc'd to some
privately
View: Complete Thread (23 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: sci.med.dentistry, alt.support.jaw-disorders
Date: 2001-04-19 16:24:10 PST
Jan has made her position clear. She doesn't pretend to be impartial,
and I
know
exactly why she is here. I respectfully disagree with her, but I like
her and
would feel
lucky to have her as a patient.
>Subject: Re: defectiveAmalgam mixers
>From: Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS bornfeldm...@dentaltwins.com
>Date: 12/6/2004 6:55 AM Pacific Standard Time
>Message-id: <31ja6hF3cfvg...@individual.net>
>W_B wrote:
>> Recommend that you join us in the moratorium
>> for CubicZirconia
>> 12 months.
>> Whaddaya say ?
>> --
>> W_B
>WB--
> I have no problem whatever with any INDIVIDUAL wishing not to reply,
>comment or block me or any other poster. I can also understand why you
>would find some posting here as personally or professionally
offensive.
> However, I personally will not participate in any organized effort to
>"freeze out" any individuals.
> I think if my activity on this and other newsgroups is examined that
>after my first year or so on usenet that I have done reasonably well
at
>avoiding personal attacks on others; that I'm certainly not afraid to
>publically disagree, but that I will only carry on discussion of a
>contentious issue where I think there is genuine discussion and
exchange
>of ideas with another. For me, endless arguments about issues and with
>individuals with which there is no meaningful exchange of ideas is not
>only a waste of time and bandwidth; it is also something that at my
age
>is not good for me (if it had ever been).
> However, I feel perfectly justified in engaging anyone in
conversation
>where I think there can be an exchange of ideas, or especially where I
>think the issue can encourage discussion with others about a
legitimate
>issue or point.
> If I only engaged people who agreed with me all the time, I would be
>talking to myself--and sometimes not even that.
>Best,
>Steve
>--
>Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS
>http://www.dentaltwins.com
>Brooklyn, NY
>718-258-5001
Jan
- Next message: Roy Brown: "Re: Implants or partials, or both?"
- Previous message: Vaughn: "Re: Snowman"
- In reply to: Matt: "Re: What the one and only gentleman destist HERE said about Jan &"
- Next in thread: Matt: "Re: What the one and only gentleman destist HERE said about Jan &"
- Reply: Matt: "Re: What the one and only gentleman destist HERE said about Jan &"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
