Re: I NEED your help!

Rich._at_.
Date: 01/23/05 

Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:00:28 GMT

On 23 Jan 2005 02:11:07 -0800, "weezie" <grsgirl@aol.com> wrote:

>No I can't wait 2+ years for an infected tooth and 6 more cavities. I
>live in the REAL WORLD. Have you heard of it?
>
>
>
>-Luiza
>
>You're right. I am angry. I don't respond well to scare tactics. I tend
>to get a little confrontational.
>
>I'm sorry, but I've got enough things to worry about. I can't walk
>around like Chicken Little.
>
>Once again, I appreciate your help, and I've heard your opinion. No
>need to hammer it into my head over and over.

It is pointless to discuss anything with the pathologic liar Jan Drew.
I proved that Jan Drew changed her story about amalgams in order to
convince others that she really had been poisoned. She is very angry
at me for doing this and responds by calling me a liar and stalker.

(Note that if you respond to my post Jan will not reconcile her
contradictory statements but instead make up lies and attack me. Jan
is a stalker who posted what she thought was my name address and phone
number and admitted that she *called* the number.

>>>Rich plays arm chair psychiatrist on the net.
>>>
>>>I suspect he was once an MD who got himself in a peck of trouble.
 
>>>RICH XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX X XXXXXXX AVE # 07, XXXXXX, HI(808) XXX-XXXX
>>>
>>>
>>>However, I called, no trace and no listing.
>>>
>>>Jan

Proof of Jan's lies:

>On 29 Oct 2004 22:58:50 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>IF* you have an unanswered health problem,,,,,,,,CHECK THE TEETH!
>>
>>NOT by a mainstream dentist, but an Alt. dentist who KNOWS the dangers of metal
>>in the mouth and root canals, and follows correct protocol.
>>
>>I did, it saved my life.
>
>A lie. And Jan Drew knows it is a lie. Here is the PROOF in Jan's OWN
>WORDS:
>
>
>
>>>I have been reading this thread. I have peripheral neuropathy. I have found a
>>>dentist (alternative) who knows that mercury amalgams are very dangerous. They
>>>can cause all manner of things. He will remove them and put in composities. I
>>>have just had 3/4 of mine remover. The others will come out in a few weeks,
>>>along with the one root canal, which will be extracted.
>>
>>>If an individual has read on this subject and is knowledgable, he will take
>>>care of you.
>>
>>>He has written "Tooth Truth and tells it like it is. He tells how the ADA has
>>>covered up this problem.
>>
>>>So, it is just a matter of finding the right dentist. He has people flying in
>>>from all over to get the work done.
>>
>>>I believe the mercury is the cause of my problems. I hav felt better today that
>>>I have in the last 2 years, and am looking forward to getting the rest of the
>>>mercury out and the root canal pulled.
>>
>>>Jan
>
>
>
>And now the admission that this improvement was due to relief:
>
> Here are her exact words:
>
>>Rich for the LAST time, I said I felt better than I had in two years. That was
>>very true. I had been very very ill and my health was deteriorating fast. After
>>much reading and research I was convinced it was my teeth. I wasn't absolutely
>>positivity 100% sure, but it all fit together and I knew I had to do something.
>>It wasn't easy, what if it didn't work? That was very stressful.
>
>>Finally all the work was done, the metal was out, the bill was paid, I didn't
>>have to sit in the dentist chairs for hours with a rubber dam in my
>>mouth!!!!!!!!!! Of course I was very relieved. A big big burden was lifted.
>>That makes one FEEL BETTER.
>>
>>What's so hard to understand?
>
>
>
>All the work was done??? A lie. The work was not completed until weeks
>later. Jan Drew even posted that her dental work was not done until
>July 11, 1999.
>
>And now for more lies. Jan Drew told two egregious lies that were told
>solely to deceive people into thinking that she really had mercury
>poisoning.
>
>The first is on June 26 ,1999 just a week after she had eight amalgams
>removed. She claimed that ALL her feet pain went away and she was able
>to go out line dancing because she was no longer getting a daily dose
>of mercury. This is a complete lie and Jan knew it. On June 26, 1999
>Jan still had more amalgams to be removed and they would not be
>removed until July 11, 1999 by Jan's own admission. You see Jan has
>difficulty keeping her lies straight.
>
>
>
>The second lie is when she posted to sci.med.dentisty that the reason
>she knows that it was the mercury in her mouth that caused her health
>problems was because she did not *begin* to regain her health until
>*after* the mercury level dropped. Not only is this a complete lie and
>Jan knows it but the complete opposite is true.
>
>
>But let us have Jan Drew tell us in her own words:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/674oy
>
>>On 26 Jun 1999, JDrew63929 wrote:
>
>>> >AF says
>>> >*** More childish nonsense from poor, sick old Jan.
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, Jan is doing fine, even went line dancing tonight! Guess that tells you
>>> something about my feet..
>>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>This simply proves that your "neuralgia" is significantly the product of a
>>somatization disorder. Mercury accumulates in the body, and there is no
>>way having your fillings removed a week or two back could have instantly
>>eliminated all mercury toxicity effects. It would take months or even
>>years for the benefits to occur, if the problem really was mercury
>>toxicity. So if pulling your fillings instantly cured your feet, we have
>>a very solid case here that your "neuralgia" was psychosomatic.
>
>
>
>>>You are way off base here. I didn't say I was instantly cured. The detoxing
>>>that I have done is a major factor in my recovery. Yes, I will continue to do
>>>it for quite some time to remove the mercury from my body. I am feeling much
>>>better, because I am not receiving a new dose of mercury each day. The
>>>elimination of 8 mercury amalgams has made a difference. Nothing psychosomatic
>>>about it.
>
>
>
>
>Nothing psychosomatic about it?!!?!?!?!?!?!? It was completely
>psychosomatic. Jan Drew's mercury level at the time she made this
>statement was the highest in her life since she had eight amalgams
>removed over a two day period only a week before.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>How do I know it was the metal? Because my mercury level was monitored by my
>>MD, it was only AFTER the metal was removed that it started dropping and I
>>started to regain my health.
>
>http://tinyurl.com/6n3ax
>
>Jan Drew began to regain her health when her mercury level was the
>highest in her entire life. That is right. When Jan Drew reported
>dramatic improvement in her health (ie better than she felt in two
>years, and being able to line dance due to all the pain gone) her
>mercury level had not dropped and was likely the highest in her life
>because this improvement occurred from hours to a week after her
>amalgams were removed.
>
>And now the proof that Jan KNEW that her mercury level rose when her
>amalgams were removed:
>
>
>On 30 Aug 2004 06:44:36 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>
>>There's never been any arguement about the fact that removing amalgams puts
>>more mercury in the body.
>
>Here is Jan accusing me of lying:
>
>On 02 Apr 2004 02:45:24 GMT, jdrew63929@aol.com (Jan) wrote:
>
>>>Peter Moran says:
>>>You claim you were "near
>>>death" from a mere eight mercury amalgams!
>>
>>W R O N G!!!!
>>
>>I have NEVER said I had eight amalgams. You have been listening to Rich's LIES.
>
>
>
>>>>On 26 Jun 1999, JDrew63929 wrote:
>>>>You are way off base here. I didn't say I was instantly cured. The detoxing
>>>>that I have done is a major factor in my recovery. Yes, I will continue to do
>>>>it for quite some time to remove the mercury from my body. I am feeling much
>>>>better, because I am not receiving a new dose of mercury each day. The
>>>>elimination of 8 mercury amalgams has made a difference. Nothing psychosomatic
>>>>about it.
>>>>Jan
>
>Jan says that she NEVER said she had eight amalgams. Above she says
>that removing 8 amalgams made a big difference.
>
>Oh wait a minute. Jan said she had 8 amalgams, not eight amalgams.
>Years is not two years. Lord have mercy.
>
>
>
>
>The reason that alternative dentists recommend slow removal of
>amalgams (some as posted by Jan Drew suggest removing no more than one
>amalgam every three months) is because the removal of the amalgams
>results in vaporization of mercury which even with perfect protocol
>will result in absorption into the body of large amounts of mercury.
>
>So on June 18 and 19, 1999 Jan had eight amalgams removed. On June 19,
>1999 Jan said she felt better than she had in two years.
>
>On June 26, 1999 Jan said that she was able to go out line dancing
>because all her foot pain was gone. Of course the pain only was gone
>for a short time because it was likely a placebo effect due to her
>RELIEF that the mercury was coming out of her mouth. Just like she
>felt better than she did in two years due to relief (by her OWN
>admission) she was able to go out line dancing a week later when the
>absorption of mercury into her tissues from blood likely resulted in
>the highest level in her life.
>
>But Jan said that she knows it was the metal in her mouth because she
>did not BEGIN to regain her health until AFTER her mercury level
>dropped. A complete lie and the pathologic liar Jan Drew knows it.
>This is why she kill filed me. This is why she lies about me being a
>liar and a stalker. Jan Drew knows that I exposed her lies and she
>refuses to admit it. She is a despicable human being whose sole
>purpose in life is to shill for alternative dentists and to perpetuate
>the lie that she had mercury poisoning from amalgams. She did not and
>the proof is in her own words.
>
>Jan Drew will not respond to any of the points in this post. Instead
>she will pretend she is not reading them and then personally attack me
>in order to discredit me. Or she will continue her stalking of me by
>posting what she thinks is my name, address and phone number. Just
>watch.
>
>
>Aloha,
>
>Rich

Quantcast