Re: Why six implants??
- From: "Vaughn" <vaughnsimonHATESSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:16:41 GMT
"Roy Brown" <roybrown@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kfBbe.3495$gA5.419706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Statistically the chances of a single failure are increasing, but with an
> increasing # of implants the odds of success of the proposed treatment are
> improving.
Exactly my point. "Belt & Suspenders" Just going by the numbers, a case
with 3 or 4 implants that is designed to "require" every implant for the success
of the case would seem to be risky.
Vaughn
>
> --
> Roy
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why six implants??
- From: Joel M. Eichen
- Re: Why six implants??
- References:
- Why six implants??
- From: Steve_R
- Re: Why six implants??
- From: Charlie via MedKB.com
- Re: Why six implants??
- From: Steve R via MedKB.com
- Re: Why six implants??
- From: Vaughn
- Re: Why six implants??
- From: Dr Steve
- Re: Why six implants??
- From: Roy Brown
- Why six implants??
- Prev by Date: Re: Root Canal work done when not needed?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Research on backpackers
- Previous by thread: Re: Why six implants??
- Next by thread: Re: Why six implants??
- Index(es):